Search for: "English v. English"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 11,207
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2020, 12:15 pm
” 4) A tale of two Roberts: two finance ministers, one English, one during the Articles of Confederation era, both scandalous. [read post]
12 May 2020, 6:30 am
”A tale of two Roberts: two finance ministers, one English, one during the Articles of Confederation era, both scandalous. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 12:12 pm
(For readers less familiar with English law, this requires the court to ask (i) is there a serious question to be tried; and, if so (ii) are damages an adequate remedy; and (iii) what is the balance of convenience). [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 12:36 pm
It was June 26, 2015, the day the Supreme Court issue its opinion on same sex marriage, Obergefell v. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
Although not an English the New South Wales Court of Appeal decision of Provident Capital Ltd v Papa [2013] NSWCA provides timely guidance in relation to a Court’s position on the obligations placed on conveyancing solicitors in relation to lending practices. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
In Hak v. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 4:12 am
In re Martha Maria Sanchez Quiroz, Serial No. 90630537 (August 5, 2024) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas V. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 12:03 pm
Park v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:27 am
Tarapore & Co. [(1969) 3 SCC 562)], ONGC v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 6:44 am
The Court found that the English courts have jurisdiction in considering and determining the terms of a global FRAND licence. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 9:45 pm
The High Court delivered its judgment yesterday in Wheeler v Office of Prime Minister dismissing the application for judicial review of the decision not to hold a referendum. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 12:54 pm
In Case C-722/17 Reitbauer (decided last Wednesday but still not available in English), the Court confirmed its decision in Feniks, according to which such an action falls under Art 7(1) Brussels Ia if it is based on a contractual right. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 6:02 am
A week ago, an item on this weblog ("IPKat rage over ECJ language issue") fulminated over the failure of the Curia website to furnish a version of the Advocate General's Opinion in Case C-497/07 Silberquelle GmbH v Maselli-Strickmode GmbH either in French or in English. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 5:50 am
Gregory ValenzaFREE SPEECH AND ENGLISH-ONLY POLICIES IN THE WORKPLACEBy Jennifer Brown Shaw and Matthew J. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:16 am
Adam Liptak wrote about the impending Supreme Court argument in Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 5:15 pm
This is only the third case in which such a finding has been made – the other two are Pfeifer v Austria (2007) 48 EHRR 175 and Petrina v Romania Judgment of 14 October 2008). [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
Coca-Cola’s treatment in Canada v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 12:01 pm
This is the second part of this Kat's analysis on Interdigital v Lenovo FRAND judgment [2023] EWHC 539 (Pat). [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 6:01 pm
"The aforesaid post also neatly summarises the legal position under the English and the Singaporean laws. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:19 am
In Smith v. [read post]
