Search for: "Fair Companies, LLC" Results 2601 - 2620 of 3,960
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2013, 9:02 pm by Anita Ramasastry
The companies collect debts on behalf of payday-loan companies that cater to Spanish-speaking customers. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 3:32 am by Peter Mahler
Schweitzer examined a disputed LLC freeze-out merger involving a realty management company. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 8:42 am by Jonathan Tycko
Hospice of Arizona ($12 Million) Three Arizona hospice companies, Hospice of Arizona LC, American Hospice Management LLC and American Hospice Management Holdings LLC, agreed to settle a False Claims Act lawsuit with the government for $12 million. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 3:16 pm by Ron Coleman
My client S&L Vitamins and I just suffered a devastating loss in its Eastern District of New York litigation against Australian Gold (now owned by a holding company called New Sunshine, LLC) after a five-day jury trial on claims by AG for tortious interference with contract and trademark infringement. [read post]
22 Sep 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
IMB+ Records Inc. 2013 ONSC 5382 http://t.co/8X5y5upZuQ -> Philip Pullman: illegal downloading is 'moral squalor' http://t.co/2aWCK5sNej -> Search engine indexing files fair use says court in Perfect 10, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 7:55 am by WSLL
Turner, Mullikin, Larson & Swift LLC, Jackson, Wyoming.Date of Decision: September 13, 2013Facts: The appellants purchased a home in Lincoln County, Wyoming. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 3:11 pm by Charles Sharman
In 2005, Congress passed the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”) in order to grant class action litigants in diversity cases easier access to the federal courts. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 12:35 pm by Lorene Park
In one case, for example, a welder who took medication for hand pain survived summary judgment on his ADA claim against a company that withdrew his conditional offer of employment because there was a dispute over whether its drug policy, which precluded narcotic use within eight hours of a shift, was based on business necessity (Huffman v Turner Industries Group, LLC). [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 2:14 pm by Louis Pechman
The company actually treated them as hourly employees, reducing their pay when they worked less than 60 hours in a week. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 2:14 pm by Louis Pechman
The company actually treated them as hourly employees, reducing their pay when they worked less than 60 hours in a week. [read post]