Search for: "Gay v. State" Results 2601 - 2620 of 3,736
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jan 2011, 3:19 pm by David Lat
Schwarzenegger – alongside David Boies, his former adversary from Bush v. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 9:05 pm by Leo Huang
He notes that the Supreme Court made it clear in United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:22 am by lawmrh
More than a decade ago, a report submitted to the Arizona State Bar Board of Governors from the Lesbian and Gay Taskforce revealed that 77% of judges and attorneys in Arizona had heard disparaging remarks against gays and lesbians. 47% had heard them in public areas of the courthouse. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
The case concerned an article published by The Times on 21 November 2022 titled Law chiefs rule against college head in gay row, which falsely claimed that Ms Rose had wrongly claimed she was professionally obliged to take on a same-sex marriage case in the Cayman Islands and had acted recklessly. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Casey to his famous series of gay rights decisions: from Romer v. [read post]
” (Judicial Division of the Council of State, 11 May 2011, 201011782/1/V1) The second example concerns a Palestinian gay from the United Arab Emirates (UAE). [read post]
8 Sep 2024, 12:57 am by Frank Cranmer
Gay cakes” again On Thursday, the ECtHR will hand down its judgment in Lee v United Kingdom, in which Gareth Lee is appealing the refusal of Ashers Baking to bake him a cake decorated with the words “Support Gay Marriage” and the QueerSpace logo. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm by Tim Paone
  In Rapanos v United States, the Court rejected what it considered overly broad interpretations of that phrase, noting that under some of the views presented, “waters of the United States” could “engulf entire cities and immense arid wastelands. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm by Tim Paone
  In Rapanos v United States, the Court rejected what it considered overly broad interpretations of that phrase, noting that under some of the views presented, “waters of the United States” could “engulf entire cities and immense arid wastelands. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 11:23 am by Rick Hasen
  Notably, Judge Reinhardt does not hold there is a right to same sex marriage, only that CA had no rational reason to take away the label of marriage for use by gay and lesbian couples after the state had had already given it. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 5:30 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
and is it different for straight men compared to gay men? [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 9:34 pm by Richard Painter
    One of the bloggers said that Olson’s actions in the California Prop 8 case are influenced not by his clients, but by his wife: http://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/244473/influencing-ted-olson-ed-whelan The other blogger is even cruder – and openly homophobic -- in calling Olson’s argument “the Gay Gettysburg Address”: http://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/49379/gay-gettysburg-address/matthew-j-franck I personally do… [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 12:37 am by Frank Cranmer
The defendants were convicted on a majority verdict of 10 to 2; their appeal went all the way to the House of Lords and was dismissed: Whitehouse v Lemon and Gay News Ltd [1979] AC 617. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm by legalinformatics
Georgia Shelby Bell, University of Minnesota: The Presidency as a Tool for Foreign Policy: An Exploration of the Implications of United States v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 3:02 pm by legalinformatics
Georgia Shelby Bell, University of Minnesota: The Presidency as a Tool for Foreign Policy: An Exploration of the Implications of United States v. [read post]