Search for: "House v. Close" Results 2601 - 2620 of 7,545
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm by Hilary Hurd
Indeed, the House has impeached over the years any number of officials for being, well, unpleasant. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 6:08 pm by Guest Author
Union Carbide, the Supreme Court found that Congress could create a private right “that is so closely integrated into a public regulatory scheme as to be a matter appropriate for agency resolution with limited involvement by the Article III judiciary. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
And all of this is simply a precursor to the repeal of Roe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:24 am by Susan Brenner
Hardesty returned to Swehla's house around 8:30 or 9:00 pm, discovered him dead on his bedroom floor, and left. . . . [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:13 am
The Government also asserts that these threats are closely linked in both time and circumstances. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm by Law Lady
Chaz Vose, a dentist at the White House Clinics-Berea, Aug. 20, 2009, to repair a cavity in her upper left molar. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am by INFORRM
Notwithstanding potential opposition to the plan in the House of Lords, abolition of Section 40 could spell the formal end of the state-backed press regulation system envisaged by the Leveson report. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 9:43 am by Josh Blackman, Seth Barrett Tillman
We do not think that a White House meeting is an “official act” under McDonnell v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 5:11 am by Henry Oliver
When the House of Lords gave the Home Secretary permission to arrest and detain people indefinitely during World War II (Liversidge v Anderson [1941] UKHL 1) Lord Atkin gave a powerful dissenting speech: “In this county, amid the clash of arms, the law is not silent. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:19 am by 1 Crown Office Row
The decision in the House of Lords in Austin v The Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis, finding that ‘kettling’ peaceful protesters and bystanders for 7 hours did not create a deprivation of liberty, has been heavily criticised; it was expected that the ECtHR would take a different stance. [read post]