Search for: "In Re Adoption of E"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 4,644
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm
A new treatment will not be adopted into practice unless there is less than a 5% chance that the results are due to chance alone (rather than due to true treatment effect). [127] * * * The P value represents the frequentist term of probability. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
The only changes from the version published in the subcommittee’s agenda book were: (1) a new sentence in Note for Rule 26(b)(1) encouraging computer search technology (that is to say, predictive coding), and (2) modifying the Note for Rule 37(e) concerning the role of prejudice in subsection (e)(2). [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm
In 1991, Peter Huber, discussing traumatic cancer claims, wrote: “After years of floundering in the junk science morass of traumatic cancer, judges slowly abandoned sequence-of-events logic, turned away from the sympathetic speculations of family doctors, and struggled on to the higher and firmer ground of epidemiology and medical science. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 1:13 pm
Additionally, ICT systems adopted by a given parliament must be quick, flexible, and meet the changing needs of the public and the members of parliaments. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
(Pix (c) Larry Catá Backer 2014)Venkatesh Nayak, Programme Coordinator, Access to Information Programme, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative in New Delhi, has requested the circulation of the following essay, entitled "Promulgating Ordinances – Public Scrutiny and Judicial Review. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:00 am
Similarly, Chevron Corp. and the American Petroleum Institute have both asked for a re-proposed Rule to be issued as quickly as possible. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:39 pm
Res. 19, Tuesday, June 3, 2014, Washington, D.C. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 8:43 am
Nothing We're Tracking Today (click for the complete Energy & EPA announcements) (c)Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:00 am
De l’avis du juge, c’est la faute la plus importante d’Hydro-Québec et Kiewit doit être dédommagée. [read post]
27 May 2014, 6:00 am
Conclusion: If you are an e-commerce company or any other business looking to come across as successful and prestigious, adopting a new gTLD is risky—the .com domain is still king! [read post]
26 May 2014, 1:10 am
Selon la Commission, il y avait « de bonnes chances d’aboutir dans des délais raisonnables à un résultat concret, à savoir à l’adoption en première lecture, à la fin du quinquennat en cours [i.e., en 1996], d’un projet destiné à l’Assemblée générale ». [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
Whatever you call it, I want to argue that both Greene and Primus are unduly pessimistic about the capacity of lawyers of all political persuasions to find practical uses for the constitutional legacy they have inherited from the New Deal and Civil rights eras.Consider, first, that my approach to the twentieth century canon adopts the very same framework that is dominant amongst politically conservative lawyers. [read post]
22 May 2014, 3:36 am
In re Chester, Serial No. 85220392 (May 20, 2014) [not precedential].Prior Registration: The Board observed that, even though a term may be distinctive at its adoption, it may become merely descriptive over time. [read post]
20 May 2014, 9:12 am
Is the defense asking the court to adopt such a rule? [read post]
13 May 2014, 10:01 pm
Now some distributors have adopted the language when buying from other distributors. [read post]
11 May 2014, 4:00 am
Il est vrai que ceux reprochés à l’appelant ont été commis en 1994 alors que la loi n’a été adoptée qu’en 2000. [read post]
7 May 2014, 8:05 am
” But that changed quickly once e-commerce and advertising began to provide an incentive for pervasive tracking and data mining. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 2:44 pm
Make yourself and what you’re doing likable. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 1:46 pm
The competing approaches are A, B, C, D and E. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:44 am
Code § 230(e)(3) (`[N]o liability may be imposed under any State or local law that is inconsistent with this section’). [read post]
