Search for: "Light v. State Bar"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 5,601
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Disclosure and Support in Australian Patent Specifications: Raised Bar Trips Applicant in Opposition
23 Jan 2016, 11:42 pm
Back in November 2015, the Australian Patent Office issued the first published decision to consider enhanced requirements for patent specifications that were introduced by the Intellectual Property Laws Amendment (Raising the Bar) Act 2012: CSR Building Products Limited v United States Gypsum Company [2015] APO 72.The decision arises from an opposition by CSR Building Products Limited to the grant of a patent on an application by United States Gypsum Company. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
Part I of this paper analyzes the ways that researchers, particularly in the United States, have attempted to define and identify cases of wrongful conviction. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) to a state agency’s proprietary acts with respect to a state-owned and funded rail line or is CEQA not preempted in such circumstances under the market participant doctrine (see Town of Atherton v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 6:22 am
Timothy O’Malley v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 7:26 am
The Court determined that this procedure is unconstitutional in light of Ring v. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 7:26 am
The Court determined that this procedure is unconstitutional in light of Ring v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 11:43 am
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, 15-141, which might have shed light on the Boston transit system’s ability to bar pro-Israel ads although it had previously run allegedly pro-Palestinian ads. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 5:05 pm
The authors suggest well-advised boards will take this approach in light of the very real, difficult to control and ever increasing enterprise threat that cyber-attack represent for their organizations. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 7:20 am
The district court got it wrong here (Connelly v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 9:07 pm
The will was executed in that State. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 11:23 am
Blake v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:33 pm
See Oachs v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 9:21 am
In a statement emailed to Light Reading and attributed to the vendor's CEO Yin Yimin, the company noted: "ZTE has a very clear Code of Conduct and, as a listed company, our employees have to adhere to the highest business standards. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 4:30 am
D’Agostino v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:32 pm
This can easily confuse the public, with red bar lights on top of the vehicle and a replica of the state seal on the side door along with the legend "Long Island SPCC, Child Protective Law Enforcement, Police. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:00 pm
State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 1:52 pm
” That sets a fairly low bar for what is a “matter[] of public interest. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:28 am
For example, in Plyler v. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 6:32 am
Portland Police Assn. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 12:11 pm
The grievance that followed has forced the Commission for Lawyer Discipline of the State Bar of Texas to settle a conflict between the disclosures required under Brady v. [read post]
