Search for: "Paras v. State"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 6,183
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2016, 9:09 am
¶71 (citing Pete Fortner, PLLC v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
The Court upheld all of the trial judge’s decisions that summary trials were appropriate stating at para 80, that “The existence of conflicting affidavit evidence establishes that there is disagreement among the affiants. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 9:26 am
State Div. of Hearings and Appeals, 2006 WI 86, ¶;¶ 12-20, 292 Wis. 2d 549, 717 N.W.2d 184. [5] Id., ¶ 16. [6] Id., ¶ 18. [7] Id., ¶ 19; Jamerson v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
SCL Builders, Inc., 2014 IL App (1st) 123663, ¶198). [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:07 pm
The AmeriKat passed out on all of herco-existence agreements...A mammoth decision from Mr Justice Norris plopped on the AmeriKat's desk last week in the long-running awaited trade mark co-existence saga of Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme [2016] EWHC 49 (Pat). [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 11:26 am
In Hunter v. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 4:16 pm
On 19 January 2016, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (Miranda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2016] EWCA Civ 6). [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:34 am
’ United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 2:09 am
As IPKat readers will remember, there are two cases currently pending before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), ie GS Media [here] and Filmspeler, which will require everybody’s favourite court to address this very issue [here and here tables summarising the state of the art regarding linking in Europe at the moment].In the meantime, Katfriend and IP enthusiast Nedim Malovic (Stockholm University) has provided a recap of what has happened since… [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 9:37 am
¶ 14. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 11:16 am
¶15 (quoting NACCO Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 2:07 am
[v] The assumption in the draft Bill appears to be that all websites would be covered by 'telecommunications service' in Clause 47(6)(a) (see e.g. the Guide para 44). [read post]
16 Jan 2016, 2:07 am
[v] The assumption in the draft Bill appears to be that all websites would be covered by 'telecommunications service' in Clause 47(6)(a) (see e.g. the Guide para 44). [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
Kewanee, 2015 IL App (5th) 140215, ¶;¶16-17. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 5:30 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 2:14 am
United States Coram nobis es un remedio extraordinario para desestimar una convicción. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 12:01 pm
" Order ¶29 (quoting Smith v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 6:00 am
(redtag.ca) v. 411 Travel Buys Limited (411travelbuys.ca), 2015 FC 19 (CanLII) at paras. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 1:21 pm
(Citing Garcia v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 5:26 am
¶ 1. . . . [read post]
