Search for: "People v. Cross" Results 2601 - 2620 of 5,569
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2014, 7:45 am by Schachtman
’ Yet, as the trial court found, ‘[o]n cross examination Dr. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am by Larry Catá Backer
United States. 379 U.S. 241 (1964) (commerce power could be used to apply an anti-discrimination statute to an establishment that served people in interstate travel and that could affect national policy); Katzenbach v. [read post]
11 May 2014, 7:42 pm by INFORRM
Michael Varey v People: The complaint was of harassment by a photographer commissioned via an agency. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 10:12 am by Katitza Rodriguez
Domestic Spying Powers and Domestic Safeguards The Convention grants extensive domestic surveillance powers to gather evidence for any crime, accompanied by minimal and insufficient safeguards, many of which do not even apply to its chapter on cross-border surveillance (Chapter V). [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 6:08 am by Susan Brenner
When he left the residence, Haney and [Winkfield] were the only people present. . . . [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 6:28 pm by Ilya Somin
We also explain how to get deal with the badly flawed 1926 ruling in Village of Euclid v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 3:24 pm by Andrew Koppelman
Because insurance pools rely on cross-subsidization of sick people by healthy participants, that would bankrupt the entire health insurance system. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:19 pm
By Mike Dorf Last week, in United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The US Supreme Court heard argument last month in McCoy v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Any general claims about distinctiveness must take into account: eligibility for protection/scope of protection; reality v. policy; words v. non-words; perception by single consumers v. aggregate; consumer search costs approach v. product goodwill approach; US v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 10:16 am by Rosalind English
When it comes down to the wire, the environment has inferior status to cross border commerce). [read post]