Search for: "People v. Cross"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 5,670
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2011, 2:43 am
Under Illinois v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 9:40 am
Goldberg In State of California v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 1:06 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 5:05 am
[This isn't surprising considering Herrera, but one of the Houston courts of appeals flirted with this understanding in a case called Telshow v. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 4:12 pm
The trial judge also had regard to evidence from other people that Mr Cripps was not a racist and did not hate Jews, and then concluded that Mr Cripps did not say what the defendants attributed to him in disputed conversations with the artists on 18 and 24 June 2009. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am
This prioritizes property over people. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:02 am
After all, reputation is gossip, i.e., what people say and think about you. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 12:36 pm
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:04 pm
Our website KennethVercammen.com provides information on traffic offenses of which we can be retained to represent people. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 7:45 pm
” People v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 9:11 am
On November 20, 2008, the day of the plaintiff’s hearing, the following comment was posted during working hours: “it’s always a mistake when people testify, because they get destroyed in cross examination”; d. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am
United States. 379 U.S. 241 (1964) (commerce power could be used to apply an anti-discrimination statute to an establishment that served people in interstate travel and that could affect national policy); Katzenbach v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 10:56 am
Both Kuziemko (2006) and Scheidegger (2009) tested a cross-section of large urban counties to determine whether the death penalty increased the fraction of murder cases that result in a plea-bargain for a life or a very long sentence. [read post]
3 May 2018, 7:45 am
There was no cross-appeal over the note. [read post]
24 Oct 2021, 6:17 am
” People v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm
Some practitioners were surprised that Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17 reached the country’s highest court. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am
Although beneficial to huge numbers of people, many vaccines also may seriously harm a very small number of people who react adversely to the product. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:02 pm
The recent case of Ameyaw v McGoldrick [2020] EWHC 1741 (QB) offers a cautionary tale about McKenzie Friends and what they can and can’t do for you in court. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 7:45 am
’ Yet, as the trial court found, ‘[o]n cross examination Dr. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
See Brooks v. [read post]
