Search for: "Peters v. Doe"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 3,582
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2011, 2:26 pm
Carnwath LJ approved Peter Smith J's statement at [17] of Hanoman v Southwark that: The wording of s. 124(1) could not, in my mind be plainer: they shall give a decision which is either in favour of accepting or denying the right to buy. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
Or should the Court grant review in Arizona v. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 5:36 am
(quoting Heard v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 1:17 am
Clarify the contexts in which the ‘AF (No.3)’ ‘gisting’ requirement does not apply. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:29 am
The first, Godfrey v Demon Internet ([2001] EWHC QB 201) and the second, Bunt v Tilley ([2006] EWHC 407 (QB)) involved the liability of ISPs, the third Metropolitan International Schools Limited v Design Technica Corp. ([2009] EWHC 1765 (QB)), the liability of Google for results generated by its search engine. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am
I mean really, how often does prior art have sex appeal? [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 4:50 pm
Judge Rakoff Rejects the SEC-Citi Settlement, But Is "Truth" Really the Purpose of Any Settlement and Does the SEC Need the Courts to Settle its Cases? [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 1:12 pm
A copy of the brief is below: Peters v West// [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
The beginnings and development of copyright and the First Amendment are still under-observed: Eldred v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 2:10 pm
The recent Supreme Court decision, Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 8:42 pm
Long-time law:/dev/null readers might recognize Peter from this entry mentioning his new blog, The True Verdict. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 8:50 am
Goldman and Peter M. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 8:50 am
Goldman and Peter M. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 5:17 am
Admittedly the Justice case recently experienced a vogue of attention in the United States, particularly among lawyers looking for possible precedents for bringing charges against the authors of the “torture memos” in Bush’s Justice Department.[4] But even this brief renaissance of interest quickly waned as the precedential relevance of the Justice appeared smaller than hoped.[5] The fact that the NMT program has long been treated as nothing more than a footnote to the IMT… [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 8:24 am
As the Supreme Court said in Eldred v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am
Peter Yost of the Associated Press reports on the brief in opposition filed last week by the federal government in Arizona v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 12:56 pm
His work is going towards First Amendment because the other alternatives won’t get the job done and the present solution risks a serious chill.53 cell phone search cases found in his search for reported opinions after Arizona v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:30 pm
In the opinion, the Florida Supreme Court addressed the following question certified to it by the Fourth District: Does the Florida Supreme Court's Holding in Allstate Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
")And the result in Habyarimana v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 5:59 am
We do not get that elegant tripartite analysis in Rhynes v. [read post]
