Search for: "Smith v. Day"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 4,470
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2013, 9:30 am
Perhaps this is a job the Supreme Court of Illinois wishes, one day, to undertake. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 7:01 am
On the second-to-last day of the 2013 summer term, a 5-4 majority of the U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 4:49 am
Organised and hosted by ATRIP president - the learned and charming Professor Graeme Dinwoodie - this 3-day conference was devoted to answering the following question: Is Intellectual Property a Lex Specialis? [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:19 pm
Oklahoma Bar Association v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 3:08 pm
The opinion in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:25 pm
Paul Smith is a Partner in the DC office of Jenner & Block. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:34 pm
Smith, Wayne E. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 7:51 am
In last week’s case (Wattar v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 8:30 am
ALAN SMITH, the Ward, Appellant, v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am
Over the past two-and-a-half years, we have published over a hundred posts on the NDAAs and related legal developments, including the Southern District of New York’s important decision in Hedges v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 2:23 pm
In Tasco, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 11:03 pm
David Smith in the Anthony Gold blog comments that it would be a good argument to make that the landlord had already complied with the prescribed information requirement by serving it on the original tenancy as there will not have been any change in that information. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 11:43 am
Which is, of course, nonsense.When the Supreme Court decided Brown v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:02 am
However the court did permit plaintiff to proceed with an equal protection claim for nominal damages based on the prison not requiring Jewish prisoners to sign similar Guidelines to participate in their holy day observances.In Laurensau v. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 3:21 pm
” RMSE3d at 582 n.93; id. at 582 n.94 (“Thus, in Smith v. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 7:00 am
We had some other valuable commentary, though, including a rather intensive three-day liveblogfest of the renewal of hearings in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:45 pm
The lawsuit, Hernandez v. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 1:08 pm
The argument that it does will run into Employment Division v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:28 pm
This is especially so when the Court recently held that the Property Clerk's failure to commence a forfeiture action within the 25 day period, after a timely demand is made, fatal; as held in the case of Property Clerk, New York City Police Department v Smith, decided by the First Department in 2009; Property Clerk, New York City Police Department v Seroda, also decided by First Department in 1987. [read post]
