Search for: "Spells v. Spells"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 3,202
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2010, 1:05 pm
Well, Big Tobacco finally received their first answer in the higher courts; from the 1st District Court of Appeals in Florida; in the case of Martin v RJ Reynolds. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 6:40 am
Alliance for Natural Health US v. [read post]
31 Oct 2024, 10:43 am
https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/articles/article-ii The Interactive Constitution: Understanding The Electoral College Sanford V. [read post]
30 May 2022, 8:17 am
A defendant raising an ineffective assistance claim in a post-conviction proceeding must meet a two-prong requirement spelled out in a 1984 U.S. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:59 am
” Since the likelihood today is that the two highest-profile cases testing new laws as forbidden “bills of attainder” both involve President Trump or his Administration in one way or another, it is useful to note that the Supreme Court went the furthest to spell out the meaning of the clause in a famous decision in 1977, Nixon v. [read post]
19 May 2024, 11:28 am
" The Supreme Court of Indiana recently reiterated that rule in its February decision in Spells v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 4:33 am
In its earlier case law (D and Sweden v Council) on same-sex partnerships, the CJEU already ruled that these could not be equated with marriage. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:02 pm
What many of those legislators and advocates want to try is exactly what Arizona voters opted to try in 1998 — and what the 5-4 decision on Monday explicitly found unconstitutional in the case of Arizona Free Enterprise Club v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 1:02 pm
The preclearance regime is spelled out in the 1965 law’s Section 5. [read post]
6 Aug 2016, 1:37 pm
Now, in A & Anor v C & Anor [2016] EWFC 42 (11 July 2016), we’ve reached the ever so slightly longer than six months milestone of 13 years. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 9:15 am
(Hiam v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 10:14 am
Editor goes beyond grammar and spell check to review your document for clarity, conciseness, formality, and punctuation conventions. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 3:33 am
In other words, Judge Kopf’s post of the 9th Circuit oral argument in Baca v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 6:02 am
In Barr v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:46 pm
The government and the state disagreed explicitly on whether a prior Supeme Court ruling, in the 1984 case of South Carolina v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 6:15 pm
Then, both sides can ask questions and take turns dismissing jurors using what are called peremptory strikes (the number of strikes varies by state, but it is often enough for one side to eliminate all qualified minorities).In a 1986 case, Batson v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 10:29 am
NEGLIGENCEGetting specific about the duty to warnDing v Canam Super Vacation Inc, 2024 BCCA 102How specific does a dangerous product warning need to be? [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 8:19 pm
Long recalled that the last of those restoration decisions, in the 1962 case of Enochs v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 1:24 pm
” Actually, there does not seem to be any real risk of that, but the entire argument in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
