Search for: "State v. L----R"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 3,825
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2011, 3:55 pm
ROBINSON, BRUCE R. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:00 am
R. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 7:44 am
See United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 4:42 am
World Pac Int’l AG (Chicago IP Litigation Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Dependent claim is not invalid under § 112 ¶ 4 merely because it recites only structural limitations of independent method claim: McDavid Knee Guard, Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 4:15 pm
” United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2006, 11:42 pm
"] The court recognized that the "212" mark is a "phantom mark" but it rejected the PTO's argument that the mark was therefore unregistrable and entitled to little weight, stating:"Although the registration of the '(212) M-A-T-T-R-E-S' mark is a 'phantom' mark, the use of which we have questioned, see In re Int'l Flavors & Fragrances, Inc., 51 USPQ2d 1516-17 (Fed. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 11:13 am
S.S. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 6:11 am
Int’l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Kentucky: Was this award for counsel fees ‘exceptional’ or less? [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:11 am
Int'l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Kentucky: Was this award for counsel fees 'exceptional' or less? [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 8:28 am
By Samuel L. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 5:11 am
Int'l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Kentucky: Was this award for counsel fees 'exceptional' or less? [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
William R. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 5:53 am
State v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
United States (Gray on Claims) CAFC: Orion v Hyundai on novelty: Expanding the scope of a printed publication with oral testimony (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: False marking includes marking with expired patent number: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 4:59 am
Hart v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 10:01 am
Wednesday's New Jersey Supreme Court opinion, State v. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 2:50 am
Case Name: Roeschlein v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:56 am
Smith," not to LBE, the actual author: There's Always Something There to Remind You by R Smith - 2003 - Related articles]Contemplate text from L. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 11:18 am
”[xii] Effective Jan. 1 and July 15, 2020, Illinois and Kentucky, respectively, became the latest states to address smart contracts directly in legislation. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 2:29 pm
(Marko Milanovic, ICJ Indicates Provisional Measures in South Africa v. [read post]
