Search for: "State v. Main"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 11,546
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2020, 8:56 am
In Gibb v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 3:48 am
S.21A was at best a spur to compliance, with the criminal sanctions for breach of the Gas Safety Regulations remaining as the main punishment. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 8:39 am
On June 15, 2020, the United States Supreme Court published its decision in Bostock v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:02 am
Mitchell, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Islington (2020) EWHC 1478 (Admin) Where a local authority has an initial s.188 Housing Act 1996 duty to provide interim accommodation, but then makes a s.184 decision that the applicant is not in priority need, is that sufficient to bring the s.188 duty to an end? [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 2:43 pm
[The decision in Bostock v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 11:15 am
Although federal taxation makes it onto the court’s main docket list, state taxation does not. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 10:50 am
Those of us following the Nokia v. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 1:00 am
A type of ‘top-down’ approach was relied on in the 2013 US case In re Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC and the 2014 Japanese case Samsung v Apple Japan (Apple Japan Godo Kaisha v Samsung Electronics Co). [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 6:46 pm
The Court in R. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 12:50 pm
Uniroyal, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 2:35 pm
In Bivens v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 1:43 pm
” In Reynolds v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 1:53 am
In a communication accompanying the summons to oral proceedings, the Board set out its preliminary opinion that the invention did not involve an inventive step (Article 56 EPC).V. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 10:08 am
by Dennis Crouch Ubisoft v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:17 am
Raich, 545 U.S. 1, 27, 29 (2005) and United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
Under the 1980 ruling in Owen v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 10:13 am
In any event, under the federal RICO statute (as opposed to the analogous state RICO statutes) showing perjury in a state court proceeding will not be enough to state a valid claim. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 2:15 pm
SSWP V WT and Redcar and Cleveland BC (HB) (2019) UKUT 372 (AAC) Very late to this one (I missed it) but a brief note on a doomed attempt in the Upper Tribunal to challenge The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Hockley & Anor (2019) EWCA Civ 1080 on how to assess bedrooms for the bedroom tax. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 1:12 pm
(See Lent v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 12:40 pm
Fontaine, Fee Shifting: A Proposal to Solve Maine’s Intractable Access to Justice Problem, 72 Me. [read post]
