Search for: "State v. Marks"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 19,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2018, 9:49 am
- Asolo v Red Bull | Questioning the trade mark judgesNever Too Late 203 [Weeks ending 14 and 21 Oct] Does FEYONCÉ blur BEYONCÉ's distinctiveness? [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 3:34 pm
For "few people keep documents of their criminal transactions in a folder marked '[crime] records.'" United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am
If the defendant isn’t offering a good or service in commerce, how can he have used the plaintiff’s mark IN COMMERCE? [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 3:22 am
Yufan Hu v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 2:59 am
Mitchell Miller, a Professional Corp. dba Miller Law Group, P.C. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 10:59 am
How far does the first sale or "exhaustion" principle extend in the United States? [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 3:06 am
Recot, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:13 pm
The statute states that dilution by blurring happens when the “association arising from the similarity between a mark or a trade name and a famous mark that impairs the distinctiveness of the famous mark. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:30 am
`. . . prosperously yours, Mark Leitner. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 12:22 pm
That lawsuit, Boudreaux v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 9:31 am
’” United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2025, 4:00 am
What Roe v Wade Should Have Said is a valuable text for those who want to learn more about the abortion debate in the United States. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 3:00 am
IdeasOne, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 10:59 am
Case Citation: Davis v. [read post]
Precedential No. 15: TTAB Refuses Concurrent Use Registration of DELMONICO'S For Restaurant Services
15 Jun 2015, 3:12 am
Southwestern Management, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 8:28 am
The January 21 letter marked a turning point for Norene. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:05 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 1:58 pm
Mark Walsh provided a “view” from the Courtroom. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 8:46 am
See id.; Jansen v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:05 am
" Bridgestone Firestone North American Tire, LLC and Bridgestone Corporation v. [read post]
