Search for: "State v. Settle"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 15,654
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2012, 7:12 am
(SSTL) in which Sistema owned about 56% stakes were declared illegal and quashed by a two judge Bench of the Supreme Court of India consisting of AK Ganguly & GS Singhvi, JJ. in Centre for PIL v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 6:31 pm
The case, Day v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:52 am
The judges observed that the Hatch-Waxman Act appears to be very sensitive to antitrust concerns, and cited several cases (inter alia, United States v Singer Mfg. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 9:44 am
Exxon settled with the state for $4 million for cleanup costs in 2008. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 4:26 am
Our guess is that plaintiff stopped getting paid a few months after settling the case. but the decision does not supply this detail. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:15 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
Murray v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 10:00 am
Girdharilal Yadav (2004) 6 SCC 325; State of Maharashtra v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:30 pm
Since Maine v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:59 pm
Justice Souter, in dissent, described the success of the Right in doing away with "the separation of church and state": The applicability of the Establishment Clause1 to public funding of benefits to religious schools was settled in Everson v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 12:12 am
During arbitration between a franchisor and franchisee, an interim interdict may be employed to enable the parties to continue to conduct their business arrangements until the dispute is settled. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 9:08 am
In Ditzian v. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 5:51 pm
Johnson v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 1:41 pm
The rule change was essential to curb the spread of arbitration since a 2015 Supreme Court ruling (DIRECTV v Imburgia) which not only held that arbitration clauses are legal but also threw out state-level bans on the practice. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 5:41 am
Corn v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 1:41 pm
The rule change was essential to curb the spread of arbitration since a 2015 Supreme Court ruling (DIRECTV v Imburgia) which not only held that arbitration clauses are legal but also threw out state-level bans on the practice. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:49 am
Gordon v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:56 am
” Unless it is settled, the case will ultimately be decided on the technicalities of U.S. trademark law. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 8:06 am
In an order issued on October 1, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States denied certiorari in Hadden v. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 5:15 am
See Zapata Corp. v. [read post]
