Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 2601 - 2620
of 13,833
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
The litigation backdrop to this decision is equivalent to the United States involvement in Afghanistan: It is a conflict with no apparent ending in sight. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 1:56 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California, which had enjoined the construction of a wall along the Southern Border of the United States which was to be constructed with redirected Department of Defense funds. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 1:31 pm
State Expense Reimbursement Laws California, Cal. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 8:53 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 5:00 am
United Airlines, Inc. and Oman v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:39 pm
Golden Door Properties, LLC et al. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 2:15 pm
Sticking closely to the reasoning of its March opinion, the CAFC reversed a decision by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California that claims of U.S. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 2:15 pm
Sticking closely to the reasoning of its March opinion, the CAFC reversed a decision by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California that claims of U.S. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 7:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 6:30 am
I agree with him that the American public as a whole (although not necessarily on a state by state basis) is probably more egalitarian on economic issues than many elites are willing to admit or tolerate. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 3:36 pm
Our amicus in the case of United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
” Prosecutors later initiated the civil forfeiture action of United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
"Prosecutors later initiated the civil forfeiture action of United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
” Prosecutors later initiated the civil forfeiture action of United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 4:58 am
Indeed, one expert in the employ of the United States government, who would go on to become a major testifying expert witness for plaintiffs in asbestos litigation, opined in a 1973 publication, that mesothelioma was a problem limited to exposure to South African crocidolite, which was not in every asbestos-containing insulation product.[9] In any event, Judge Wisdom never directly addressed Section 388, and the framing of the Borel case as a consumer case prevailed. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 11:54 am
Walker and his allies argue that each state should have a single vote, but California would surely object on one-person-one-vote grounds to giving the same weight [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 7:20 am
She received her law degree from Harvard Law School and also earned an M.A. and Ph.D. in philosophy from the University of California, Berkeley. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
UPDATE CALIFORNIA WATER RIGHTS AND SUPPLY Abatti v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:50 am
Yesterday I reported on a courtroom insanity of potentially pathological proportions in Munich (Nokia v. [read post]
