Search for: "United States v. Olds" Results 2601 - 2620 of 8,863
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2011, 8:21 am by Charles Abut
 The United States Supreme Court just issued a decision arising out of a child abuse interview of a 9 year old by a state child protective services worker and a county deputy sheriff. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 9:56 am by Alex Mostaghimi
Allison Elizabeth Fluke-Ekren, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, 5/15/2019. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 9:56 am by Alex Mostaghimi
Allison Elizabeth Fluke-Ekren, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, 5/15/2019. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
Cl. 2, Amendments IX, X[1]·      German Basic Law, arts.20-25; 31[2]·      Constitution of South Africa, arts. 1, 2, 39, 146-150[3]·      Indiana Code 1-1-2-1[4]·      Hierarchy of Law in Georgia[5]__________Hierarchy of Law in the United StatesConstitution of the United StatesArticle, § 1All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a… [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 4:48 am by SHG
Oral argument will be had today in United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 12:28 pm
Alexander was not eligible for protection under the state’s “stand-your-ground” law; thus, the 31-year old mom was convicted of felony aggravated assault and hit with the 20-year jail sentence. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 8:28 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Jury Poll Experiment The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued an opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 12:44 am
("Boston Scientific") cross-appeal, from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 5:52 am by admin
First, whether § 51 applies to all state building codes or “only those concerning fire safety” as stated in McAllister v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 8:20 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
The union also states that some bargaining units aren’t viable without a requirement that all employees share in the cost of representation. [read post]