Search for: "parts-76" Results 2601 - 2620 of 3,443
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2011, 8:08 pm
Marine Trade Ass'n, 389 U.S. 64, 76 (1967). [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:40 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Marine Trade Ass’n, 389 U.S. 64, 76 (1967); see also Square Liner 360, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 2:59 am
 A new, first-ever standard for Campylobacter will be no more than 10.4 percent positive samples for chicken.Salmonella causes approximately 1.4 million illnesses and 400 deaths and Campylobacter is responsible for more than 800,000 illnesses and 76 deaths in the U.S. annually. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 12:07 pm by Sheppard Mullin
 The problem with this approach, of course, is that IRAD and B&P development efforts are part of what needs to be defined in making the “private” and “federal” expense determination. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:51 am
Board of Educ. of Hempstead UFSD, 76 AD2d 837, affirmed, 55 N.Y.2d 648].** Anne M. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 5:13 pm by FDABlog HPM
  On November 26, 2010, FDA approved Ranbaxy’s ANDA No. 76-786 with a period of 180-day exclusivity that expires on May 28, 2011 based on Ranbaxy's Paragraph IV certifications to the ‘864, ‘321, ‘911, and ‘841 patents. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 11:32 am
Johnson Controls, Inc., 499 U.S. 187, 214, 111 S.Ct. 1196, 113 L.Ed.2d 158 (1991) (White, J., concurring in part and concurring in the judgment)); Sawyer v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 8:55 pm by Simms
  However, not having the freedom to get a little wasted behind the doors of your own home or “private place” is baffling, especially to those not from around these parts. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 10:05 am by velvel
April 4, 2011Discursive Comments On The Oral Argument In The Court of Appeals In The Madoff Case On March 3, 2011.PART 5 Next up was Helen Chaitman for rebuttal. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:44 am by The Legal Blog
Justice GangulyThe Supreme Court in Revanasiddappa & Anr. vs Mallikarjun & Ors. has examined the question whether an illegitimate child is entitled to a share in coparcenary property or his share is only limited to the self-acquired property of his parents under Section 16(3) of the Hindu Marriage Act? [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 10:48 am by lopeznoriega
En noviembre de 2005, el 76% de la población del estado votó en un referéndum (la “Proposición 2”) a favor de incluir una cláusula en su Constitución para prohibir el matrimonio gay. [read post]