Search for: "Clinton v. Clinton"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 3,308
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:56 am
The High Court ruled, in Clinton David Jacobs v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2010] EWHC 231 (QB), that under European Union Regulation 864/2007 (Rome II), Spanish law applied in the case of a UK resident seeking compensation for serious injuries sustained in Spain, at the hands of an uninsured driver, then resident in Spain.The claimant issued proceedings against the defendant, the Motor Insurers' Bureau, in its capacity as a compensatory body under the Motor Vehicles… [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 2:56 am
The High Court ruled, in Clinton David Jacobs v Motor Insurers' Bureau [2010] EWHC 231 (QB), that under European Union Regulation 864/2007 (Rome II), Spanish law applied in the case of a UK resident seeking compensation for serious injuries sustained in Spain, at the hands of an uninsured driver, then resident in Spain.The claimant issued proceedings against the defendant, the Motor Insurers' Bureau, in its capacity as a compensatory body under the Motor Vehicles… [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 5:58 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:02 am
The San Francisco Chronicle also reports on Yoo’s latest filing in Padilla v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 2:24 pm
In the same week that erstwhile White House independent counsel Kenneth Starr was appointed president of Baylor University, a highly anticipated new book delving into his long-running investigation of former President Bill Clinton was released by another law school dean, Duquesne's Ken Gormley. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 6:33 am
” (The case was originally filed by the Clinton Administration in 1999.) [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 4:37 pm
v=mHV4nDS501Y -- afforded reason enough to suspect something along these lines even before the latest Republican volte face on the individual mandate. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 9:13 pm
Clinton, Jr.Copyright 2010 [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 8:43 pm
Clinton, Jr.Copyright 2010 [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 1:12 pm
Leroy V, Inc. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 6:14 pm
” Purdy v. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 12:18 am
I don’t think this works under Smith v. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 1:11 pm
Here is the link to the fourteen-minute podcast and a road map of highlights: 0:50—The meaning of Brown v. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 5:00 am
The specifics of the case involved a movie created by Citizens United about Hillary Clinton. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 10:24 am
So a Reagan, a Bush I, and three Bush II's, plus a Clinton. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 7:04 am
Reporting and commentary on the import of last month’s ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 11:51 am
Ballard v. 121 W. 45th St. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 9:03 am
Clinton, Jr.Copyright 2009 [read post]
