Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office" Results 2621 - 2640 of 14,562
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court to use a lawsuit over a fatal shooting by a New Mexico State Police officer to roll back the ‘qualified immunity’ that protects police from liability. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:07 am
The Court also pointed out that Florida has a stricter standard for summary judgment, requiring that the moving party show conclusively that no material issues remain for trial (Byrd v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 9:47 am by Josh Blackman
In 2020, I advanced a related position before the Supreme Court in Little Sisters of The Poor v. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 3:45 am
§ 1341, the federal mail fraud statute, and is based upon the mailing of allegedly fraudulent invoices from Heppt's office in Manhattan to the Kirks' residence in New Jersey (Compl. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 3:52 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Plaintiff then sued in federal court, and the state argued that the district court had no jurisdiction because state law says that policymakers can only have their discrimination claims adjudicated in administrative agencies like the EEOC. [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
With respect to Petitioners' claim the Supreme Court should have granted their motion to remove the matter to federal court, the Appellate Division, citing Geiger v Arctco Enters., Inc., 910 F Supp 130, said "the right of removal is vested exclusively in [respondents and a petitioner] simply may not remove an action from a state court". [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
With respect to Petitioners' claim the Supreme Court should have granted their motion to remove the matter to federal court, the Appellate Division, citing Geiger v Arctco Enters., Inc., 910 F Supp 130, said "the right of removal is vested exclusively in [respondents and a petitioner] simply may not remove an action from a state court". [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am by Andrew Hamm
Bartlett, the court ruled that a plaintiff’s First Amendment retaliatory-arrest claim failed because police officers had probable cause to arrest him. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 8:08 pm
Weideman Earlier this week, the California Supreme Court issued its opinion in McDonald v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday evening, the court asked both sides in Gloucester County School Board v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 10:05 pm by Walter Olson
He also disputed its claim that police officers may ignore “No Trespassing” signs to invade a homeowner’s property without a warrant. [read post]