Search for: "DOE v. UNITED STATES"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 44,309
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2023, 5:46 am
” United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 12:00 am
I combine administrative data from the National Vital Statistics System, National Instant Criminal Background Check System, and United States Sentencing Commission for the period from 2010 through 2020. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 10:24 pm
S. 162 (2011); United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 4:40 pm
—John Erskine 1Castro v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 3:54 pm
From Warren v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 3:15 pm
In a 5-4 ruling in Arizona v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 1:19 pm
See United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 11:40 am
" Hernden alleges that Defendant Frank Bednard—member and president of the Board— then forwarded Hernden's email to the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) with a complaint about her behavior. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 9:28 am
United States, which construed § 922(g) to require the government to prove that a defendant must have known of the condition that rendered him ineligible to possess a firearm. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 6:46 am
United States, which entails a legal issue that was the subject of the 2023 Gibbons Criminal Procedure Moot Court Competition, where my partner, Gaby Pinzon, and I represented the University of Miami School of Law in winning First Place at the competition. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 5:17 am
Pugin v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
Public utility regulation as a distinct field of law arose at the end of the nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth centuries in the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:28 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States has descended from the disciplined legal reasoning of John Marshall and Joseph Story to the mystical aphorisms of the fortune cookie. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 10:14 am
Yesterday the United States Tax Court issued an opinion in Sanders v. [read post]
See(2)(A) You Later: Supreme Court Holds that DOJ Has Broad Dismissal Authority Even After Unsealing
21 Jun 2023, 9:59 am
Supreme Court, in United States ex rel. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:15 am
Under the statute, this responsibility is left solely to the President of the United States. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:07 am
But it does not help plaintiff. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
Importantly, the Court’s discussion of the source-identifying function of trademarks, repeated emphasis on source confusion as the principal harm in trademark law (see, e.g., the type of confusion “most commonly in trademark law’s sights”, “the bête noire of trademark law”, and the “cardinal sin under the law”), and discussion of the United We Stand America opinion suggests the Justices may like Rogers’ focus on preventing uses… [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
In fact, the State of Maryland allowed someone to sue on its behalf pursuant to state law in the landmark case of McCullough v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
The Canadian fair dealing user’s right has some superficial similarities to the United States fair use exemption. [read post]
