Search for: "Doe Defendants I through V"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 12,262
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2020, 7:17 am
Vasquez, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:40 pm
In Rafaeli, LLC v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Modesto Irrigation Dist. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 2:30 pm
Vance and Trump v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 3:50 pm
The Eleventh Circuit does not explain how the defendants’ Medicare billing practices were material but defendants’ Medicaid billings were not. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 9:13 am
This footnote came to my attention through Judge Dillon’s concurrence in State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 2:55 pm
Supreme Court in Varjabedian v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 9:22 am
In Gonzalez v. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 3:19 am
In this case, the defendant was in the Philippines, where service through diplomatic channels could take six months or considerably more. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm
The only thing this ban does is protect pharmacies from competition. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 7:39 am
Cordray published a notice in the Federal Register that stated: I believe that the actions I took during the period I was serving as a recess appointee were legally authorized and entirely proper. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
As discussed below, I think that there will likely be pressure for such change as lawyers continue to oppose provision of legal services by non-lawyers. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:17 pm
In 1944, New York’s highest court, the Court of Appeals, held, in a silicosis personal injury case, that: “[i]t is a matter of common knowledge that it is injurious to the lungs and dangerous to health to work in silica dust, a fact which defendant was bound to know. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 5:30 am
Nor does Justice Gorsuch. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 5:21 am
When viewed through the lens of claimants seeking justice for alleged serious non-recent sexual abuse, two issues are striking: (i) the claimants had no choice but to attend a medical examination if they wanted to be employed by the bank; and (ii) the appointment of Dr Bates over several years was solely a matter for the bank. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 3:50 am
But the statute does not specify who pays the fees. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 9:56 am
More importantly, for purposes of the cultures of political organization--that impulse to fuse meaning with the idol (object) constructed to house it is then reconstituted as a template through which all forms of social organization are constructed. [read post]
4 Jul 2020, 6:45 am
I will watch, but I want to get through this live blog first. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 1:48 pm
From Tuesday's decision by Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall in Elliott v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:48 am
In Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
