Search for: "Does 1-54"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 3,413
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2011, 8:39 am
Auto accidents kill more than 40,000 people in the U.S. each year; they are the No. 1 cause of death for people between the ages of 1 and 34. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm
However, the Board wishes to add that according to the established case law of the Boards of appeal as far as the extent of disclosure of a document that is part of the state of the art within the meaning of A 54(2) is concerned, it is the date of publication that is decisive (T 205/91 [4, last paragraph]).[3.5] As a consequence, the subject-matter of claim 1 of the main request is not novel. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm
Therefore, the requirements of A 54 are not fulfilled.To read the whole decision (in German), click here. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 4:21 am
Go to 1:28 ish. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 11:23 am
” N.J.S.A. 2A:34-54. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 2:02 am
Local Law 54/2010 – Prohibition of “Once-through” Cooling Systems · NYC Green Code Proposal: Water Efficiency 6 (WE6) · Effective Date: January 1, 2011. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm
To that extent, the decision does indeed not comply with R 68(2), first sentence, EPC 1973. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 8:15 pm
Rather, the Act merely sets out the minimum to which an employer is exposed in the event of termination without adequate notice, and does not create a ceiling for damages in this field. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:09 pm
” Id. at *54. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 7:00 am
“We had interactions with 54 external counsel. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 2:57 pm
Super. at 54. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 5:57 am
The Labor Dept. reported on Friday, April 1 +216,000 jobs. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 11:36 am
Does 1 through 5865? [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 10:49 am
This represents a spike of 54% in number of audits from the previous year. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
See §256b(a)(5)(A)(ii), (a)(5)(D), (a)(7)(A), (a)(D)(1)(b)(i), (d)(1)(B)(i), (d)(1)(B)(iv)(I), (d)(2)(A). [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 6:29 pm
Whether the CSAO are actually looking into possible misconduct by one or more parties remains to be seen, as does any action they may pursue. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 5:43 pm
[1] 5 C.F.R. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:01 pm
The transformation of a claim directed to the use of a substance or composition for a certain purpose into a Swiss-type claim or a purpose-limited product claim pursuant to A 54(5) leads to an extension of the scope of protection.4. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 7:26 am
Before the Court, three issues remained live: (a) whether the patent was invalid for insufficiency or was so ambiguous that it could not be infringed; (b) whether the Patent was invalid for added subject matter; and (c) whether, if valid, what Delta does amounted to an infringement within the meaning of s60(1) PA 1977 – in other words, was Delta “making” the patented article? [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:01 pm
In the present case, pursuant to A 101(1), the OD had the duty to examine, in accordance with the IR, whether at least one ground for opposition under A 100 prejudices the maintenance of the European patent. [2.2.2] Normally, the OD only examines the grounds for opposition which have been duly submitted and substantiated, pursuant to A 99(1) together with R 55 c) EPC 1973, i.e. in the present case, A 100 (a) together with A 54 and A 56.[2.2.3] However, in the present case… [read post]
