Search for: "F. v. R."
Results 2621 - 2640
of 15,735
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
More than Criminalization, not yet Women’s Constituional Right, (En Hübner Mendes, C. y Gargarella, R. [read post]
22 May 2015, 8:33 am
R. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 9:30 pm
Subscribers only, unfortunately.From the Daily Beast: legal historian R. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 1:42 pm
Murphy, 724 F.3d at 1229 (quoting Kramer, 705 F.3d at 1128). [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 11:36 pm
R. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 10:38 am
., b/n/f Tricia Gracey Tominack v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 4:10 am
F.3d 511Laron Ball was on trial murder. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:48 pm
Curry v. [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 4:34 am
Brothers-in-law can be a problem to a successful car sales operation as is sadly set forth in Brausch v Devery 2018 NY Slip Op 31929(U) August 7, 2018 Supreme Court, Suffolk County Docket Number: 11-28918 Judge: Denise F. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 5:30 am
See Collado v. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 8:03 am
Danke an Sebastian für den Hinweis! [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 9:28 pm
R. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 4:27 am
On appeal from: [2020] EWCA Civ 363 The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed this appeal concerning whether the Court of Appeal was wrong in its conclusion that Her Majesty’s Passport Office’s policy does not unjustifiably breach articles 8 and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”).The policy in question holds that (i) an applicant for a passport must declare their gender/sex as being either male or female and (ii) a passport will only be issued bearing… [read post]
28 May 2012, 9:00 am
Cash v. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Today’s case of the day, Angellino v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Va. 1994), aff’d, 47 F.3d 116 (4th Cir. 1995); Spence v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Va. 1994), aff’d, 47 F.3d 116 (4th Cir. 1995); Spence v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Va. 1994), aff’d, 47 F.3d 116 (4th Cir. 1995); Spence v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:01 am
On Friday, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in the highly-publicized tax evasion case against actor Wesley Snipes, U.S. v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 6:00 am
He cited it was in violation of PERM regulation 20 C.F.R. 656.17(f). [read post]