Search for: "Look v. State" Results 2621 - 2640 of 41,126
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2009, 7:08 am
The state of Texas’ views were invited in Rhine v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 4:59 pm by Amy Howe
Black sites and state secrets In United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am by Blog Editorial
  Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 9:02 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Together the firms, which received $4.3 million in incentives, had promised to create 161 jobs.Of some facts about the legal disagreement previously discussed on IPBiz, note the following text within MAX-PLANCK-GESELLSCHAFT v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 7:41 am
In part two of my three part series on the fall out from the Murphy v IRS decision of July 3, 2007 in which the issue of taxability of damages in a wrongful termination suit was reviewed by the US Federal Appeals court, we will look at the implications for trial lawyers, plaintiffs and settlement professionals. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 8:00 am by Bruce Nye
  He and his researchers looked at all post-trial proceedings, including any appeals, trying to determine the extent to which the courts  were following the due-process mandates of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 8:35 am by Jeff Welty
I have not conducted a 50-state survey of calendaring practices, but even a quick look shows that prosecutors retain a role in calendaring in some other states: In South Carolina, the state supreme court ruled complete prosecutor control unconstitutional in State v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am by Blog Editorial
James Wolffe QC, now appears in support of the Respondents. 15.16 Lavery QC states that the will of Parliament should not overrule the will of the Irish people and that the triggering of article 50 without their consent would do just that. 15.14 Lavery QC says that Northern Ireland has a complex constitutional settlement that is legally binding as a result of  section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act 1998. 15.10  Lavery QC says that section 1 of the Northern Ireland Act… [read post]