Search for: "Mark Harms" Results 2621 - 2640 of 10,414
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2010, 9:42 pm by Joel Jacobsen
You can read a marked-up version of the bill here and a legislative analysis here. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 4:12 am by R. David Donoghue
The balance of harms also weighed in Harley-Davidson’s favor because of the public interest in avoiding consumer confusion. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 9:46 pm
Suppose rule X, which is intended to sanction harmful behavior A, turns out, on its terms, also to authorize sanctioning of much less (or non) harmful behavior B. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 8:59 am by David
[1] Ohio Code Annotated § 959.18 titled “Prohibition against killing a carrier pidgeon” makes it unlawful to “shoot, kill, maim, entrap, catch, or detain” a marked pidgeon. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 12:53 pm by admin
“These women bear a mark of being deemed less than a full person. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 6:15 am by Law Offices of Robert Dixon
For example, a product liability claim requires establishing that the product (i.e., the waterslide) contained a defective design, had a manufacturing defect, or was insufficiently marked with warnings. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 5:35 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Domain Name System is a logical target b/c domain names often incorporate word marks. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  And it followed that VPX couldn’t show harm, since without materiality there can be no harm—something I really wish trademark cases would recognize! [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 8:31 am by Mirriam Seddiq
  My friend Mark Kamish, a criminal defense lawyer in Indiana, and I met years ago at the National Criminal Defense College in Macon, Georgia. [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 11:50 am
Louis Vuitton wasn't happy, and brought an action for trade mark infringement, trade mark infringement and dilution. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 10:13 am by Marty Schwimmer
"    VT responded that "any person or business would be free to use any mark for any purpose simply by claiming to support the business of the owner of the mark. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 3:18 am by Woodrow Pollack
Fla. 2001))).Plaintiff adequately pleaded this count because it pleaded: (1) it commenced business first; and (2) defendant's use of the mark would harm plaintiff.Motion to dismiss granted in part, otherwise denied.Savtira Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 10:43 am by Draeke Weseman
  In such situations, the law views the defendant’s enjoyment of the goodwill earned by the plaintiff under its mark as a harm to the plaintiff. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 11:00 am by Bruce Carton
I'm not trying to get all "Nostradamus" on you, but I think we can now all agree that Aug. 16 marked the end of a simpler age, when humans did not bring great harm to themselves and others because they were trying to provide updates about their "status" to other humans who probably didn't give a hoot anyway. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 12:51 am by Larry Downes
Silicon Valley should take careful note of the dark turn in the agency’s view of what constitutes competitive harm. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 4:01 am by Laura Levin
Brown (wikipedia) The Bee article notes that this marks the first time that the state of California has actively enforced the 2005 Safe Cosmetics Act, which requires full disclosure of harmful ingredients in product labels. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 10:27 am
Benjamin, reportedly struck three marked squad cars before pulling over to flee on foot. [read post]