Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 2621 - 2640 of 21,682
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2022, 3:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Professionals of NY, PLLC, 111 AD3d 1430, 1432 [4th Dept 2013] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 2:46 am by Jan Jacobi
These questions were recently answered in a ruling by the CJEU in the Globus v. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
Xu was indicted for committing the crime of subverting state power on 5 August 2021. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 1:36 pm by Katherine Pompilio
Orin Kerr analyzed an Eastern District of Virginia judge’s ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
., that an individual will become ill or die within a stated period of time or by a certain age). [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 12:42 pm by News Desk
Based on the chicken staying in the enclosed bag, fully labeled for USDA compliance including a mark of inspection, the kit is excluded from USDA oversite. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 3:52 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Judge Sandra Ikuta's opinion today (joined by Judges Mark Bennett and Ryan Nelson) in Riley's American Heritage Farms v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 2:20 am by Chijioke Okorie
The Registrar of Trade Marks is precluded from registering GI goods or class or classes of goods, where there is the likelihood of confusion as to the true place of origin of such goods or class or classes of goods. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 8:47 am by Jane Bambauer
  Most political leaders want to regulate the largest social media platforms to deal with the current misinformation and bias problems, but a veritable who’s who of internet law scholars (such as Jack Balkin, Daphne Keller, Mark Lemley and Ashutosh Bhagwat) have pointed out that politicians want contradictory things: more content removal and less content removal. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 4:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
However, to the extent Shubaderov and Egorov seek an award of treble damages in the context of the legal malpractice cause of action, it fails to state a cause of action pursuant to Judiciary Law § 487 (see Pszeniczny v Horn, 193 AD3d 1091; Gorbatov v Tsirelman, 155 AD3d 836, 840). [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 2:00 am by Mark Schickman, Schickman Law
That section prohibits an employer from retaliating against an employee for sharing information he “has reasonable cause to believe . . . discloses a violation of state or federal statute” or of “a local, state, or federal rule or regulation” with a government agency, with a person with authority over the employee, or with another employee who has authority to investigate or correct all the violations. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
Art, Music and Copyright The Evan Law blog has an article summarising Finley v. [read post]