Search for: "Power-One Inc. v. United States" Results 2621 - 2640 of 3,369
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2011, 10:13 pm
United States, 434 F.3d 1359, 1368 (Fed. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 7:29 am by admin
As background for their decision, the court cited the long history of recusal in the United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:23 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
This article was sponsored by the United States Air Force, a Presidential Young Investiga- tor Award, and Motorola, Inc. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 12:36 pm
In a case the Court indicates “does not even strike us as close,” the United States Supreme Court placed considerable limits on district courts’ powers to enjoin copycat class actions from proceeding in state courts. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:42 pm
United States, 137 U. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Applying Pierre Bourdieu’s concept of legal fields, the data suggested that both systems produce legitimacy but in quite different ways and, interestingly, that the one more similar to domestic legal systems takes that form due to political forces, not by an incremental process powered by people with legal backgrounds. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Applying Pierre Bourdieu’s concept of legal fields, the data suggested that both systems produce legitimacy but in quite different ways and, interestingly, that the one more similar to domestic legal systems takes that form due to political forces, not by an incremental process powered by people with legal backgrounds. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
(IPKat)   United States US Patent Reform Campaign against America Invents Act intensifies (Inventive Step) Will you be crushed like a bug? [read post]
29 May 2011, 9:30 am by J. Gordon Hylton
  Kowalski began the 1948 Spring Training season with Pueblo, but before the regular season began he was demoted to the Class B Asheville Tourists of the Tri-State League. [read post]
27 May 2011, 8:56 am by Kali Borkoski
Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's reply10-627Title: Extreme Networks, Inc. v. [read post]