Search for: "RUSSELL MAYS"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 5,044
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2014, 5:30 am
Russell Woelfel (Miamisburg, Montgomery County) pleaded guilty Oct. 23 in Columbus Municipal Court to workers comp fraud, a first-degree misdemeanor. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Here is my list of the eight largest derivative lawsuit settlements of which I am aware: Get the SEC Out of the PR Business by Russell G. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 12:09 am
You’re not getting any younger you know Russell. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 11:05 am
It looks like the Court may have chosen Walker v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 6:17 am
Russell (1966), Keyishian v. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 5:02 am
[Disclosure: Tejinder Singh of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in Christeson.] [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 4:11 pm
Shields, Sims, and Stafford have been out of custody on home electronic monitoring since their May 2012 arrest. [read post]
20 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
[Disclaimer: Tejinder Singh of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, filed an amicus brief in support of the petitioner in Christeson.] [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 11:00 pm
Ask any doctor or veterinarian to rate the important medical discoveries of the past century, and antibiotics would surely be at or near the top of the list. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 2:42 am
” [Disclosure: Kevin Russell of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to one set of petitioners in the Alabama redistricting cases. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 4:41 pm
— Nate Russell (@nrusse) November 14, 2014 By all appearances, the LSBC president certainly seemed to be saying that cloud services with foreign-based servers were done for in BC. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:38 pm
Russell, 86 U.S. 433, 466 (1873) (same). (...)Since the creation of this court in 1982, we have addressedIndustrial Chemicals and the original patentrequirement on four occasions: In re Hounsfield, 699 F.2d1320 (Fed. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 1:09 pm
On revenue recognition convergence, the Senator complained that the new standards appear to have weakened US GAAP revenue recognition and may open the door to greater revenue recognition abuses. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
Dean seeks an answer to whether, in antitrust or other cases in which the plaintiff must prove causation in fact as an element of the claim, a plaintiff must produce evidence of causation to defeat a motion for summary judgment, or whether a court may instead presume causation at summary judgment and permit the case to proceed to trial based on that presumption. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 4:03 am
If attendance is truly voluntary, on the other hand, then the party may not be in the course and scope of employment, and as a result, you may not have these liabilities as an employer. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 12:29 am
I saw Russell Crowe in “A Beautiful Mind” driven mad by such pursuits. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 10:02 am
Ho that “you say just have us decide it, and in this case, I’ve read an awful lot that [leads me to think that] you may well lose. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:15 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 5:43 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, filed an amicus brief in support of neither party in M&G Polymers.] [read post]
