Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 2621 - 2640
of 8,957
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am
An undoubtedly correct I-9 is one as to which the employer has not become aware of any credible facts calling into question the right of a current employee to work in the United States. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 10:46 am
An undoubtedly correct I-9 is one as to which the employer has not become aware of any credible facts calling into question the right of a current employee to work in the United States. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 9:52 am
United States (audio here). [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 10:25 am
" In United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 6:53 am
Tenth Circuit opinion: MURPHY v ROYAL OPINION Order Denying En Banc Petition [amended panel opinion] Here are the merits briefs: Joint Appendix Petitioner’s Briefs Petitioner’s Brief United States Brief in Support of Petitioner States Amicus Brief in Support of Petitioner Environmental Federation of Oklahoma Amicus Brief International Municipal Lawyers Association Amicus Brief Oklahoma Independent Petroleum Association… [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 7:16 pm
The Patent Act directly states that a losing petitioner has a right to appeal if it loses the IPR. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 1:18 pm
§ 141(c) (“A party to an interpartes review or a post-grant review who is dissatisfiedwith the final written decision of the Patent Trial andAppeal Board . . . may appeal the Board’s decision . . . tothe United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 11:33 am
The modern Commerce Clause jurisprudence would not be what it is without the efforts of two Federal Public Defenders who happened to catch the Supreme Court’s eye in United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Courts in New York State have consistently recognized the importance of using progressive discipline.Rulings by the New York State Supreme Court, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, suggest an employer’s in assigning severe penalties for certain “first offenses” may not survive judicial review. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 7:05 am
If those same people now leave the United States after an NTA is filed with EOIR, resulting in their not appearing at a court hearing, they will be issued removal orders in absentia and face 5-year bars to returning to the United States in any status. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 8:46 pm
With the issued K-1 visa, our client’s fiancée came to the United States and married our client in May 2018. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 1:13 pm
Immigration officers are trained to identify fraudulent or “sham” marriages where either party or both parties have entered the marriage simply for the green card applicant to obtain his or her permanent residence in the United States, without any sincere intention to live together in the same household or form a marital bond. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 12:51 pm
” The Petitioner, David Svoboda, was a lineman for an electrical utility co-op in Iowa. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 12:15 pm
Judge McKee, concurring: Evidence of innocence is substantial; "for some inexplicable reason, police simply refused to follow even the most obvious leads that did not confirm their suspicion that [petitioner] was the killer. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 11:16 am
Appellee stated that he was in fear of physical harm. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:58 am
” The cases This hypothesis is easily testable at the Supreme Court level because all of the relevant data are available, mainly from the United States Supreme Court Database. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 5:30 am
Likewise, a court must simply accept the government’s assurance that a country accepting the detainee will not jail the detainee at behest of the United States. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 6:45 am
Sessions Bodes Well for Overturning Matter of A-B- (ImmigrationProf Blog, July 2018) [text]Related posts:- Regional Focus: United States - Pt. 1 (24 July 2018)- News: New Legal Decision on Domestic Violence (15 June 2018)Tagged Publications. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 6:00 am
In Ortiz v United States, 585 U. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 12:53 pm
Kavanaugh is currently a Judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
