Search for: "United States v. Michigan" Results 2621 - 2640 of 3,728
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
As the Supreme Court has stated, "[a] criminal act committed wholly within a State 'cannot be made an offence against the United States, unless it have some relation to the execution of a power of Congress, or to some matter within the jurisdiction of the United States.'" Bond, 572 U.S. at 854. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 1:58 pm by Eugene Volokh
As the Supreme Court has stated, "[a] criminal act committed wholly within a State 'cannot be made an offence against the United States, unless it have some relation to the execution of a power of Congress, or to some matter within the jurisdiction of the United States.'" Bond, 572 U.S. at 854. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm by John Elwood
United States, 17-8160, apparently involving the same issue as the already granted United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
  United Food and Commercial Workers Union (UFCW) v. the U.S. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am by John Ehrett
Michigan 14-8106Issue: (1) Whether Miller v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 8:20 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
The union also states that some bargaining units aren’t viable without a requirement that all employees share in the cost of representation. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 8:20 am by Tammy Binford, Contributing Editor
The union also states that some bargaining units aren’t viable without a requirement that all employees share in the cost of representation. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:41 am by NCC Staff
Republicans Don’t Know What to Do with Their Bad-Faith ACA Case By Nicholas Bagley, Professor of Law, University of Michigan Law School Nicholas Bagley compares the vigorous support the first Supreme Court case against the Affordable Care Act garnered from the conservative establishment and Republican party against the far weaker backing for the current case, California v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 12:09 pm by Russell Beck
” Ninth Circuit (California): On December 15, the 9th Circuit took oral argument  in its en banc (full court) review of the controversial United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:39 pm by Mike
Judge Susan Illston stated this was not a problem because the court could "group[] similar state laws together and apply[] them as a unit. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 8:10 am by Neal Fortin
  I cover this in my book, Food Regulation: Law, Science, Policy, and Practice, in discussion of the case, United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 8:40 am
He  pressed a federal government lawyer to say whether “the United States takes the position today” that “the sovereignty and dignity of Georgia is less than the sovereign dignity of Ohio, and that of Alabama less than that of Michigan? [read post]