Search for: "United States v. State of Michigan" Results 2621 - 2640 of 3,234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2015, 9:18 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-419. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Fletcher,  Foundation Professor of Law & Director of the Indigenous Law and Policy Center, Michigan State University College of Law -- Nomos and Anishinaabe Inaakonigewin   M. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 6:16 am by Adam Klasfeld
Like the four consolidated cases, Michigan Welfare Rights Organization alleges that Trump incited the attack on the U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 9:04 pm by Dan Flynn
Smith of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, who presided over United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 10:22 am by Jeff Gamso
The Supreme Court laid it out in a capital case, United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
While Lessig treats Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 2:15 am by NCC Staff
After the boycott ended, Parks moved to Virginia and to Michigan. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 3:21 am
  A “covered jurisdiction” could be an entire state, or a county, city or other governmental unit at the local level. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:27 am by Maxwell Kennerly
It could spend a whole decade doing nothing but affirming appeals of cases initially filed in the United States District Court for the District of Guam. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
Obviously, in the wake of Citizens United and perhaps more significantly still for business, Sorrell v. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
When the M/V Galani hit the M/V Marina in the Paros-Antiparos Strait, a woman named Curtis with wounds most injurious brought suit in the United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 10:00 am
" [24] The state expressly states that such a user may not have not have protection within the laws of Michigan, unless there is a state or federal statute that expressly requires a manufacturer to warn. [25] Other states have also chosen to adopt the doctrine. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:29 am by Mark Walsh
Justice Scalia’s point is to chide the majority for concluding that one state might be responsible for eliminating all twenty-one units of pollution if that state can do it most economically. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Robyn Powell
For decades, students with disabilities had been denied access to public schools throughout the United States. [read post]
26 May 2009, 5:09 am
  In a matter of first impression, the Court addressed the impact the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Desert Palace, Inc. v. [read post]