Search for: "V D" Results 2621 - 2640 of 76,326
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2015, 5:35 pm by David R. Cleveland
In a post last Monday on Prawfsblawg, entitled, On Not Creating Precedent in Plumley v. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
Dans les décisions G2/12 et G2/13, la Grande Chambre de recours avait jugé que si la CBE interdisait clairement de breveter des procédés essentiellement biologiques d'obtention de végétaux et d'animaux, les végétaux et animaux obtenus par des procédés essentiellement biologiques n'étaient quant à eux pas [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 4:59 am by tortsprof
Two weeks ago, the USSC ruled that victims of a terrorist attack in Turkey failed to state a claim for aiding and abetting against certain social media companies under Section 2333(d)(2) of the Antiterrorism Act. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 5:26 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
§2254(d)(2), a federal court may grant a state prisoner habeas relief if his claim was adjudicated on the merits in state court and "resulted in a decision . . . based... [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:19 am
  On the issue of confidentiality in the SEP context, the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf stated, in the Sisvel v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 12:36 pm by Ashwin Sharma Esq.
District Court for the District of Columbia’s decision to overturn USCIS’s denial (on Specialty Occupation grounds) in RELX, Inc. d/b/a/ LexisNexis USA, and Subhasree Chatterjee v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:02 am by sally
Association belge des Consommateurs Test-Achats ASBL and others v Conseil des ministres (Case C-236/09); [2011] WLR (D) 67 “Article 5(2) of Council Directive 2004/113/EC was invalid with effect from 21 December 2012 since it permitted European Union law and consequently member states’ laws, to derogate from the principle of equal treatment of men and women, guaranteed by articles 21 and 23 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, without temporal… [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 3:18 am by traceydennis
Al Hassan-Daniel and another v Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs [2010] EWCA Civ 1443; [2010] WLR (D) 331 “There were perceptible and sound policy reasons why the defence of ex turpi causa non oritur actio did not form part of the Strasbourg jurisprudence, save when the matter came to just satisfaction. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 1:02 am
Like all good news sources (see, for example, here and here), I am bound to report that the decree nisi in the case of The Nation's Sweetheart v Cashley Cole is due to be pronounced in the Principal Registry this morning. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 3:07 am
(d) Willfulness This is perhaps the most interesting point of Judge Koh's Order. [read post]