Search for: "*in Re Jones" Results 2641 - 2660 of 5,705
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jan 2014, 3:04 pm by Jen Lynch and Jennifer Lynch
This is why we’ve asked for a week’s worth of data collected by all of LAPD and LASD’s ALPR cameras, in addition to policies and procedures on how the agencies say they’re using the technology. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Jones (2004) 33 Cal.4th 917, 931-937), appropriately may be invoked and applied in the present case, including whether the issue was preserved in the trial and appellate courts and whether article XIII, section 32 of the California Constitution would be implicated by applying the doctrine. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
Section 1 – Serious harm A statement is no longer defamatory unless a claimant can show that ‘…its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to [his/her] reputation…’  This section builds on the jurisprudence of Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 75 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) and is intended to deter trivial claims. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 11:54 am by Shawn Nevers
 A Supreme Court clerkship is an incredibly prestigious and coveted position in the legal field and we’re excited to have one of our own at the Court next term. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 8:38 am by Eric Goldman
However, occasionally judges simply reject Section 230 because they don’t like it (this year’s crop include Jones v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 6:11 am by Joy Waltemath
“You don’t really think we’re going to go back and rip out every decision made,” Scalia said. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 5:15 am by Walter Olson
., not a person like Noel Coward, but confusingly enough is represented by Noel Francisco of Jones Day, who is a person. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 9:35 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
According to a report by the Baltimore Sun, the accident occurred near Jones Junction and the Bel Air police barracks. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 5:38 am by Gritsforbreakfast
“What we’re saying is that technology changes what’s possible, and as a result, we may need to add legal barriers to compensate for those changing technical barriers. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 8:49 am by Michael Markarian
As we look back on 2013 and head into the second part of the two-year Congress, we’re poised for significant gains on several priorities. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am by CAJ
The Court of Appeal rejected what it considered to be a suggestion by the appellants that there should effectively be a re-hearing of the issue of whether the discrimination was justified given that the right to appeal was on a point of law only under s.13(1), Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, noting the Supreme Court’s guidance on the dividing line between law and fact in R(Jones) v First-tier tribunal [2013] UKSC 19 (citing paragraph 16 of Jones). [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 12:46 am by CAJ
The Court of Appeal rejected what it considered to be a suggestion by the appellants that there should effectively be a re-hearing of the issue of whether the discrimination was justified given that the right to appeal was on a point of law only under s.13(1), Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, noting the Supreme Court’s guidance on the dividing line between law and fact in R(Jones) v First-tier tribunal [2013] UKSC 19 (citing paragraph 16 of Jones). [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 9:55 am by Jeff Foust
“And we’re the first generation that can do something about it. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 3:43 am
In re Nicholas Jones, Serial No. 85855449 (December 13, 2013) [not precedential].The examining attorney submitted dictionary evidence indicating that both the word SHIT and the phrase NO SHIT are considered vulgar, and he argued that that "the commercial impression of the designation [NO $#! [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 4:28 pm
  As you'll see, almost all of the materials that we'll be covering in class are available for free online, so you can poke around the links and follow along if you're so inclined. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 8:08 am by The Murray Law Firm
Further, claims of this magnitude will surely demand local officials re-evaluate driver safety at this intersection. [read post]
29 Dec 2013, 12:31 pm by Ron Coleman
As we all painfully know, on the internet, nobody knows you’re a dog. [read post]