Search for: "BELLE v. STATE"
Results 2641 - 2660
of 2,989
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
Specifically, in the recent case of Worsoff v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 10:33 am
Thus I pass over in silence the excellent contributions of Conor Casey and Daniel Bell, not because I disagree with them, but simply because in the former case I have no impartial standpoint from which to assess Casey’s suggestion that there is a deep continuity to my own work over time, and in the latter case because Bell’s effort to read the classical legal tradition in light of Confucian legal theory is a subject that I will have to study more deeply before I can say… [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
-Frankfort v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
After expressly stating the test of essentiality/non-essentiality, Justice Binnie later restated his test as a test of non- essentiality as follows: It would be unfair to allow a patent monopoly to be breached with impunity by a copycat device that simply switched bells and whistles, to escape the literal claims of the patent. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:35 pm
Joseph V. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 5:58 am
Professor William Hubbard, in "The Problem of Measuring Legal Change, with Application to Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 4:00 am
Entitlement to punitive damages may be either in the first phase or the second phase (see Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limitée v. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 10:40 am
The bell means it’s time to leave! [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:35 pm
Joseph V. [read post]
10 May 2014, 7:01 pm
Straus (1908) and as recent as Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:46 am
Azzarello v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 5:13 pm
” Brenman v. [read post]
[Jonathan H. Adler] Divided Sixth Circuit Refuses to Stay FDA's Denial of Vaping Product Application
16 Nov 2021, 10:20 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 11:29 am
Bell and Nguyen v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 3:13 am
For instance, in Texas v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 4:00 am
In Eli Lilly Canada Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
As summarised in an Isle of Man judgment, the scheme resembled a “Ponzi” scheme in that apparent repayments to HC were in fact funded in a circular way by HC itself: see paragraph 30 of the judgment of His Honour Deemster Corlett, Heather Capital Limited v KPMG Audit LLC, 17 November 2015. [9] A third party, Nicholas Levene, was a participant in the scheme. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 12:43 pm
Thus, he joined a dissent by Chief Justice Melville Fuller in United States v. [read post]
