Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office" Results 2641 - 2660 of 14,562
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2023, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
The Federal Court of Appeal wrote in Salt Canada Inc. v. [read post]
If the en banc court, which has today separately ordered en banc consideration of Lucia v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 2:58 am
The revocation was upheld by an administrative judge, but overturned by the Circuit Court for Harford County, on the basis that CCA had no authority to revoke family day care licenses, that authority having been entrusted by regulation to the Office of Child Care Licensing and Regulation ("OCCLR"). [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 11:53 am by National Indian Law Library
Supreme Court Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/currentsct.htmlPetition for certiorari was filed in Miller v. [read post]
24 May 2014, 2:14 pm
The United States Supreme Court gave clear criteria in Michigan v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 2:58 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Gurung v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 62 (02 February 2012) Aksu v London Borough of Enfield [2012] EWCA Civ 60 (02 February 2012) County Leasing Asset Management Ltd & Anor v Michael Green Plant Ltd & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 53 (02 February 2012) UG (Nepal) & Ors v Entry Clearance Officer [2012] EWCA Civ 58 (02 February 2012) Leeds City Council v Price &… [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 12:21 pm by Howard Friedman
Plaintiff claims a corrections officer threatened to poison him for his reporting the officer's failure to provide him with hot water for his Ramadan breakfast.In Williams v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 12:37 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Baker & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government& Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 141 (28 February 2008) Giles v Rhind [2008] EWCA Civ 118 (28 February 2008) Fulham Leisure Holdings Ltd v Nicholson Graham & Jones (A Firm) [2008] EWCA Civ 84 (28 February 2008) Kosmar Villa Holidays Plc v Trustees of Syndicate 1243 [2008] EWCA Civ 147 (29 February 2008) AS… [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
At SCOTUS OA, Tonja Jacobi and Matthew Sag write that the court “seemed considerably less inclined to allow the [Patent and Trademark Office] to prohibit swear words than to prohibit racial slurs. [read post]