Search for: "Davies v. United States" Results 2641 - 2660 of 2,778
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In addition to his many important decisions, Story’s three-volume Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States was and remains extremely influential.Neither Marshall nor Story is an uncomplicated hero, however. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 12:04 am
. Visit In-House Counsel Fake Drugs Create a Bitter Pill for Patients Overseas IP Law & Business In the United States, the most commonly counterfeited drugs are "lifestyle" medicines like Viagra, but in poor countries, it's the life-saving drugs that are fakes. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:52 pm by WSLL
Fox, Davis & Cannon, LLP, Cheyenne, Wyoming; Kendal R. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 11:31 am by John Lewis and Jessica Greenberg
It requires class counsel to submit a settlement accounting to the director of the Federal Judicial Center and the director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts that identifies how all monies paid by the defendant are distributed. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:31 am by SHG
The case helped bring an end to the death penalty in New York and was cited by the United States Supreme Court in the 1966 Miranda v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 7:58 am by Barbara Moreno
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Fisher, Louis, Reconsidering Judicial Finality: Why the Supreme Court is Not the Last Word on the Constitution (2019). [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 6:53 am
The purpose of this Convention is "to notify to other States where a launching State's space objects are located in order to prevent collision" and to make "identifiable the potentially liable launching State for damage cause by a space object. [read post]