Search for: "Does 1 - 20" Results 2641 - 2660 of 28,799
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2012, 9:19 am by Lindsay J. Jarusiewicz
This is in addition to a $500 fine plus a 20 percent penalty of the wages owed in the case of a first offense or a $1000 fine plus a 20 percent penalty of the wages owed for subsequent offenses. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 3:09 pm by David Friedman
The raid was part of “ 'Operation Constant Gardener,' basically a PR stunt in which the agency conducts multiple pot raids on April 20, or '4/20.'"2. [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 6:23 am by John Jascob
Peirce and Roisman also noted that a Section 13(b)(2)(B) violation does not require a showing of scienter, while a violation of Exchange Act Rule 10b-5 would require such showing.Peirce and Roisman also observed that the Andeavor matter presented several "complications. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 7:37 am
” For divorces finalized before June 1, 2018, this formula will only apply when the parties’ combined gross income is below $250,000. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 10:36 pm
6-20-09Employers may soon see a spike in future drug costs for settlements going through the MSA approval process after June 1, 2009. [read post]
20 May 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Does it feel like you are on a roller coaster? [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 6:10 am
The Obamas' new house is less than 20% the size of that place. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
  In the past 20 years in the media field we have seen the establishment of the law of privacy and more recently the extension of that to police investigations. [read post]
4 May 2018, 6:54 am by Scott R. Anderson, Megan Reiss
While 34.3 percent of respondents view the use of nuclear weapons as a justified response to the most imminent threat presented—an attempted military strike—less than 20 percent of respondents felt that the use of nuclear weapons would be justified in response to actions that are less imminent than an attempted military strike. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 2:50 am by Eric S. Solotoff
  1)  Is "indefinite alimony" a nicer term for "permanent alimony" 2)  While certainly possible and appropriate in many circumstances under existing law for marriages of less than 20 years, permanent alimony was infrequently given in marriages less than 20 years after the limited duration alimony statute was enacted. [read post]
5 May 2020, 1:20 am by Hayleigh Bosher
German copyright law does not include a pastiche exception, which is listed in Article 5 as an optional exception in the InfoSoc Directive. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 7:35 pm
    I have been involved in many cases - especially those in which the claimant is in his 20's or 30's - when the judge specifically includes in his decision that a particular claimant should be reviewed in 1 year, or perhaps 3 years. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
According to R 108(1) the EBA shall reject the petition as inadmissible if the petition does not comply with A 112a, paragraph 1, 2 or 4, R 106 or R 107, paragraph 1(b) or 2. [2.1] The mandatory requirement set up in the above-cited provisions that the petition shall be reasoned is not a formality. [read post]