Search for: "State v. Masters" Results 2641 - 2660 of 3,927
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2011, 12:30 pm by Steve Bainbridge
In contrast to judges in other states, however, Delaware chancellors frequently have considerable prior corporate experience as practitioners. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:23 am by Larry Ribstein
He uses as the text for his sermon VC Noble’s recent opinion in Brinckerhoff v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 10:35 am by Abbott & Kindermann
State Water Resources Control Board (2011) 52 Cal.4th 499); and the prevailing party’s recovery of attorneys fees for administrative time under Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 (Edna Valley Watch v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 12:12 am
Master Lock Co., 616 F.3d 1231, 1242 (Fed. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 1:46 am by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: WXY v Gewanter, heard 11-15, 18-19 July 2011 (Slade J) Commissioner of Police v Times Newspapers, heard 18-20 & 22 July 2011 (Tugendhat J) Morrison v Buckinghamshire CC, heard 20 to 21 July (HHJ Parkes QC) The Queen on the application of Guardian News and Media Limited -v- City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court heard 11 October 2011 (Master of the Rolls, Jackson… [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 8:44 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
[Note the Therasense case; Therasense v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am by INFORRM
The Master of the Rolls accepted the claimant’s submission that conditions (b) and (c) were not satisfied in relation to the detail of the allegations. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
The Master of the Rolls accepted the claimant’s submission that conditions (b) and (c) were not satisfied in relation to the detail of the allegations. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
The Master of the Rolls accepted the claimant’s submission that conditions (b) and (c) were not satisfied in relation to the detail of the allegations.  [read post]