Search for: "UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE"
Results 2641 - 2660
of 6,104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2016, 2:38 pm
March 7, 2016) that a patent-agent privilege exists but that privilege extends only to communications with the agent related to the agent’s representation of the client before the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 3:08 pm
If dissatisfied with a refusal, an applicant can appeal the decision to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB” or “Board”) of the United States Patent & Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 1:10 am
., recently announced that the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) for the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) denied six of Symantec Corporation’s petitions for inter partes review (IPR) of Finjan patents. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 9:59 am
Patent and Trademark Office, and then by enforcing those rights against competitors, imitators, and would-be users in an effort to keep them as far away as possible from the property. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 4:06 pm
December 22, 2015) which struck down as facially unconstitutional Section 2(a) of the Lanham Act which bars the United States Patent and Trademark Office from registering scandalous, immoral or disparaging marks. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 12:25 pm
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 10:20 am
Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) provides for ownership of general concepts as well as tangible inventions. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 10:14 am
Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 1:21 pm
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) granted the IPR petition filed by Adidas AG and instituted inter partes review of claims 1–46 of the ’011 patent. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 11:06 am
Failing to recognize the genre’s name, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) initially refused Sony’s application on grounds of likely consumer confusion with a similarly named company. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 5:54 pm
A frequently asked question in our practice is, can an acronym register at the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) and be protected as a federal trademark? [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:54 am
Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent and Trial Appeal Board by the America Invents Act of 2011 have transformed the relationship between Article III patent litigation and the administrative state. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 4:15 am
In the Tam ruling the court stated that what the Patents and Trademarks Office does is to look at what message the referenced group takes from the applicant’s mark in the context of the applicant’s use, and it denies registration only if the message received is a negative one (page 22):“Thus, an applicant can register a mark if he shows it is perceived by the referenced group in a positive way, even if the mark contains language that would… [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:30 am
In CBM2015-00161, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) at the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) recently instituted a Covered Business Method (CBM) review on a non-business method patent with a clear and unambiguous technological aspect. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 6:30 am
In CBM2015-00161, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) at the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO) recently instituted a Covered Business Method (CBM) review on a non-business method patent with a clear and unambiguous technological aspect. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 2:00 pm
Covidien LP, an appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 9:49 am
As part of the Kasich-Clinton deal the budget of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) was raided for additional money to help plug shortfalls elsewhere. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 9:49 am
As part of the Kasich-Clinton deal the budget of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) was raided for additional money to help plug shortfalls elsewhere. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 1:46 pm
” (citation omitted)).The case: Appeal from the United States Patent and TrademarkOffice, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/002,241. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 7:49 pm
As such, the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of partial summary judgment and remanded the case back to the district court to instruct the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office to enter a disclaimer of the term “THE RAT PACK” on TRP’s trademark registration for ““THE RAT PACK IS BACK. [read post]
