Search for: "1-8 Doe"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 32,312
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2007, 5:12 pm
The definition of "office" in the article is the the Office of Medicaid Policy and Planning established by IC 12-8-6-1. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 11:56 am
The Court of Appeals held that ORS 166.065(1)(a)(B), the abusive speech provision of the criminal harassment statute, does not, on its face, violate the free expression protections in Article I, section 8, of the Oregon Constitution,(1) and that the statute also is not unconstitutional as applied to defendant's conduct in this case. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 2:35 pm
Effective July 1, 2009, HB 525 is the new standardization act pertaining to documents filed with Ohio county recorders.HB 525 creates a revised Section 317.114 of the Ohio Revised Code, with the following guidelines for recorded real estate documents.1) Computer font size of at least ten point;2) Maximum paper size: 8 ½ x 14; Minimum paper size: 8 ½ x 11;3) Margins of 1 inch on each side of the page and on bottom;4) 3 inch… [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 10:09 am
Pharmaceuticals Does your business have inventions that require Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval? [read post]
24 Nov 2022, 3:13 am
These actions were based on various claims resting on absolute grounds: lack of distinctiveness (Sec. 8(2)(1) German Trade Mark Act), descriptiveness (Sec. 8(2)(2)), and bad faith (Sec. 8(2)(14)). [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:01 pm
(d) A will executed in compliance with Section 2-1003 shall not be invalid merely because it does not comply with this section. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 5:22 am
In an interesting decision from October 2020, the EU General Court considered that there was no likelihood of confusion between the signs ‘Athlon Custom Sportswear’ and ‘DECATHLON’ pursuant to Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 (the EU Trade Mark Regulation (EUTMR)). [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 4:35 pm
(7) Poliomyelitis (polio) (8) Rubella. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 2:46 pm
Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal Board (the “Board”) holding that claims 1–8 of U.S. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 4:03 pm
As relevant here, Family Court Act § 812(1) provides: "Jurisdiction. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 8:04 am
, 8/24/11). [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 11:06 am
[1] SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (“Release No. 34-89218; File No. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
I want to say 2 things to the DC medics. 1. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 11:16 pm
"Chapter 9: How to Statisticulate"Does it make sense? [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 6:00 am
Individual was appointed by the Board to serve as the boys’ varsity basketball coach and this appeal ensued in which Petitioner argued that [1] The Board violated 8 NYCRR §135.4 in appointing Individual to the boys’ varsity basketball coach position and [2] sought an order annulling Individual's appointment and ordering the Board to appoint Petitioner as the boys’ varsity basketball coach for the 2019-2020 season. [read post]
24 May 2015, 3:22 pm
Thus, "[t]he law does not require that the information contain the most precise words or phrases most clearly expressing the charge, only that the sex crime and the factual basis therefor be sufficiently alleged" (People v Sylla, 7 Misc 3d 8, 10 [2d Dept 2005]). [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
I want to say 2 things to the DC medics. 1. [read post]
General Court allows registration of CORNEREYE ... and an argument based on Brexit (briefly) appears
11 Apr 2020, 8:28 am
This, coupled with the fact that the earlier mark had a high degree of distinctiveness in light of the extensive use of the mark and its reputation (particularly in the UK) led to the conclusion that there was a likelihood of confusion on the part of the relevant public.In its appeal, the applicant made two claims: First, that the decision should be annulled on the basis of: (i) infringement of Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 (this argument was rejected, and will not be… [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 3:19 pm
A few quick comments:(1) Does the bolded (in the original) conclusion with regard to Apple Sales International sound factually unreasonable, or even seriously contestable? [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 6:00 am
Individual was appointed by the Board to serve as the boys’ varsity basketball coach and this appeal ensued in which Petitioner argued that [1] The Board violated 8 NYCRR §135.4 in appointing Individual to the boys’ varsity basketball coach position and [2] sought an order annulling Individual's appointment and ordering the Board to appoint Petitioner as the boys’ varsity basketball coach for the 2019-2020 season. [read post]
