Search for: "Bell v State"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 3,019
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2009, 7:33 am
The victims included 12-year-old Bobby Bell Jr., son of the store owner, who was wounded. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 10:59 am
Bell v. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 4:42 pm
Neither is it open for anyone to do so either: Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd [2011] HCA 11, at 72, per Heydon, Crennan, Bell JJ; and indeed, had the transcript been different than the transcript provided by the official transcriber, it would constitute a serious offence as an officer of the court. [read post]
30 May 2008, 9:09 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: WHO members near accord on global strategy on IP and health: (Intellectual Property Watch), (GenericsWeb), (Gowlings), (IAM), Copiepresse seeks up to €49 million from Google in lawsuit over right to feature links to publishers’ content on internet: (IPKat), (Ars Technica), (Techdirt), (Out-Law), (IP Law360) Singapore ‘image… [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
Specifically, in the recent case of Worsoff v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
-Frankfort v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
After expressly stating the test of essentiality/non-essentiality, Justice Binnie later restated his test as a test of non- essentiality as follows: It would be unfair to allow a patent monopoly to be breached with impunity by a copycat device that simply switched bells and whistles, to escape the literal claims of the patent. [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 10:07 am
From Chief Judge Eric Melgren's opinion yesterday in Schmidt v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:46 am
Azzarello v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 4:00 am
Entitlement to punitive damages may be either in the first phase or the second phase (see Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limitée v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:35 pm
Joseph V. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 5:58 am
Professor William Hubbard, in "The Problem of Measuring Legal Change, with Application to Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
7 Sep 2015, 10:40 am
The bell means it’s time to leave! [read post]
10 May 2014, 7:01 pm
Straus (1908) and as recent as Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:35 pm
Joseph V. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 3:13 am
For instance, in Texas v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 11:29 am
Bell and Nguyen v. [read post]
[Jonathan H. Adler] Divided Sixth Circuit Refuses to Stay FDA's Denial of Vaping Product Application
16 Nov 2021, 10:20 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 5:13 pm
” Brenman v. [read post]
