Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 34,277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2013, 1:16 pm
Ferguson v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 6:00 pm
The plaintiffs argue their case is certifiable as a class action under California law. [read post]
19 May 2010, 10:17 am
Answer: No, according to Fourth District Court of Appeal, Division Three, in Parks v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 12:25 am
Yesterday, the California Supreme Court denied review in Bufil v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:38 pm
With Arizona v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:33 am
State of California v. [read post]
31 Aug 2013, 8:00 am
City of Pittsburg, 574 F.3d 696 (9th Cir. 2009) erred in concluding that California broadly defines police officers’ duties as a matter of law for the purpose of First Amendment retaliation analysis; and Placement on administrative leave can constitute an adverse employment action. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 1:29 pm
You can read the decisions in California v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 1:48 pm
On December 22, 2016, the California Supreme Court issued a critical decision in Augustus v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:50 am
The policy provided that New York law applied. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 12:36 pm
AB 5: Employee Classification As previously reported, in April 2018 the California Supreme Court’s decision in Dynamex v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 10:10 am
On Tuesday, in Lynne Wang v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:16 pm
" In Almond Alliance of California v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 6:09 am
” This right was first recognized in 1906 by the United States Supreme Court in Winters v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 10:00 am
However, pursuant to California law, the HOA was not actually created until the sale of the first unit. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:32 pm
(Welch v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 10:16 am
The court referred to Perez v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 5:15 pm
” The California Supreme Court spoke on this subject in the late 19th century case of Kennedy v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 12:49 pm
Nonetheless, I think the Court of Appeal’s decision was really iffy as a matter of California law, and I think it’s likely that this opinion will be reversed by the California Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 10:00 pm
Supreme Court’s June decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
