Search for: "Does 1 - 38"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 4,958
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
’774 patent col. 2 l. 58–col. 4 l. 38 (ex parte reexamination certificate). [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
[xxx] It does not take a particularly vivid imagination to come with a myriad of undesirable scenarios that may occur, should the Court rule against Yates. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 6:25 pm
In that setting, service upon the misnamed party after the statute of limitations has run does not bar the lawsuit. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
The First Amendment protects truthful, nonmisleading commercial speech promoting lawful products or services, but especially when the products or services are themselves protected by other constitutional rights, such as the right to abortion or the right to buy contraceptives.[1] What is true for unenumerated constitutional rights must be at least as true for the enumerated right to bear arms, which includes the right to possess and acquire handguns.[2] Plaintiff firearms dealers are… [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Raich,[1] 545 U.S. 1 (2005) Supreme Court of the United StatesAlberto R. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 3:05 pm
***” The 95% certainty appears to derive from 95% confidence intervals, although “confidence” is a technical term in statistics, and it most certainly does not mean the probability of the alternative hypothesis under consideration. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 9:23 pm
Maryland, 17 U.S. (4 Wheat.) 316, 401–25 (1819) (same); Legal Tender Cases, 79 U.S. 457, 536–38 (1870) (paper money); Myers v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:00 am
[1] Judicial Diversity: Accelerating Change, page 7 [2] ibid., page 7 [3] ibid., page 5 [4] As of 1 October 2014. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
IV, §§ 28-91 to 28-116 (1991); Aspen Municipal Code § 13-98 (1977); Boulder Rev.Code §§ 12-1-1 to 12-1-11 (1987). [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 2:48 pm
Juror No. 4: It’s difficult, but does that mean she gets nothing? [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:43 am
Id. at 239, 658 S.E.2d 37-38. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
We’ve made no secret of our distaste for the so called “heeding presumption” – that juries may presume that any alternative “adequate” warning would have been heeded by the plaintiff (or, in prescription medical product cases, the prescriber). [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 6:46 am
App. 1 Cir. 5/2/14) (La. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:55 pm
App. 1 Cir. 10/28/09), 29 So. 3d 621, 621 (La. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 4:00 am
For this last week: 1. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 10:31 am
Related blog posts: Illinois Appellate Court Finds That Rental Car Companies Must Be Treated No Differently Than Any Other Self-Insured Entity Illinois Attorneys Have a Duty in Wrongful-Death Actions to Decedent’s Beneficiaries Illinois Corporations Can Be Deposed; Illinois Supreme Court Rule 206(a)(1) [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 4:05 pm
Ram-Forwarding, Inc., 29 S.W.3d 635, 637-38 (Tex. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 1:38 pm
§§ 922(g)(1) and 924(e)(1). [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
38. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 8:02 am
Earlier this year, we posted a feature analyzing how the Sixth Circuit has not been hesitant in imposing sanctions under Federal Appellate Rule 38 for frivolous and unwarranted appeals. [read post]
