Search for: "Does 1 - 41" Results 2661 - 2680 of 4,707
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2014, 12:23 pm by emagraken
Norlander, 2012 BCSC 719 (Master)… [34]         Read together, the above authorities stand for these propositions: 1. [read post]
24 May 2014, 4:59 am by Dennis Crouch
A £25 million project is so small that it does not even reach Unilever company management – how then could it be outstanding? [read post]
22 May 2014, 1:48 pm
Pro. 41 is at all relevant to the constitutionality of the procedure. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:15 am
As to the character of the Clippers, there does not appear to be a true 'form of title' applicable, per Marriage of Brooks & Robinson (2008) 169 CA4th 176, 86 CR3d 624. [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Their position requires that they be “held to higher standards of integrity and ethical conduct than attorneys or other persons not invested With the public trust”.[89] To ensure that the public does not lose confidence in the judicial system, a delicate balance is required to maintain a degree of judicial insulation from society so that judges remain impartial arbitrators While at the same time allowing them to be active members of the community. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:40 am
I was provided by the parties with 546 pages of written submissions and 41 files of evidence and other materials, which I have done my best to assimilate. [read post]
10 May 2014, 1:37 pm
  The efforts of states under the GP are founded on the 1st Pillar duty (GP Principles 1-10) to "protect against human rights abuse within their territory and/or jurisdiction by third parties, including business enterprises" (GP Principle 1) as a specific expression of the basic general state duty to "respect, protect and fulfill human rights and fundamental freedoms" (GP General Principles). [read post]
10 May 2014, 4:00 am by SHG
Because of Rule 41(D)(1), the government takes the view that it can take anything and everything it wants first and, after having and keeping it, sifting through it, seeing whatever there is to be seen, enjoying the fruits of the poisonous cloud, only then does a judge get to decide that it’s unconstitutional. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 12:41 pm
Here are some thoughts on answers: 1) The greatest difference a warrant requirement would impose is requiring probable cause to believe evidence will be found inside the phone. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 12:00 pm by Moderator
While there is no formal investment screening by the GOP, the government does monitor large foreign investments.Panama's privatization framework law does not distinguish between foreign and domestic investor participation in prospective privatizations. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 1:45 am
"Jeremy Phillips - shaking up the IP world with sharp analysis and  casual humor since 1973Our dear blogmeister Jeremy Phillips came to podium with 41 years of experience in IP in his belt and introducing "Phillips's Three Rules of Change". 1. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 5:30 am by admin
Why does it matter? [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
” Alleging that the Employer’s determination was arbitrary, capricious and made in bad faith, Petitioner argued that:(1) he should have been afforded the protections mandated by Civil Service Law Section 75, and as outlined in Article 33 of the Collective Agreements between the State of New York and the New York State Civil Service Employees Association; (2) while minimum qualifications of employment may not rise to acts of misconduct that would invoke disciplinary procedures… [read post]