Search for: "Does 1 - 47"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 4,469
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2014, 2:14 pm
However, the South African case does not involve a denial of the opportunity to practice law (Chang himself was admitted to the New York State bar before being denied the right to gain a license to practice after moving to California), but rather a scenario in which activist lawyers (often communists) disbarred or struck from the roll of attorneys and advocates while fighting apartheid, were later (in the post-apartheid era) reinstated to the bar. [read post]
8 May 2014, 4:13 am
And does some bill have to “win” and move on to become a law? [read post]
3 May 2014, 8:56 am
Cherry picking does not necessarily imply scienter, but in science, it is a strict liability offense. [read post]
1 May 2014, 9:32 am
Camberg, 247 S.W.3d 342, 346-47 (Tex.App. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 1:39 pm
In his new article, The Case Against Federalizing Trade Secrecy, forthcoming in the Virginia Law Review, Chris Seaman does what the title suggests: he makes the case against federalizing trade secrecy protections and challenges the wisdom of current proposals in this direction. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 3:08 pm
The court finds that the subject infant indeed suffered multi-system failure as a consequence of the oxygen deprivation she suffered between 12:47 p.m., when the fetal monitor was disconnected and the mother was moved to the operating room, and 1:22 p.m., when she was delivered, that likely continued during the immediate post-delivery resuscitative period. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 10:08 am
The court finds that the subject infant indeed suffered multi-system failure as a consequence of the oxygen deprivation she suffered between 12:47 p.m., when the fetal monitor was disconnected and the mother was moved to the operating room, and 1:22 p.m., when she was delivered, that likely continued during the immediate post-delivery resuscitative period. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:44 am
Code § 230(c)(1). [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 11:19 pm
§ 20.18(h)(1)(I), (ii)? [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 3:36 pm
But what does this amount to? [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 3:36 pm
But what does this amount to? [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 8:42 am
Still, this ruling does not end the legal scuffles over revenge porn. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 10:19 pm
Since January 1, 2014, 34 incidents of school shootings have occurred in the United States. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 10:28 pm
In the area of family law (§ 47 – 67) one might want to take a look at the conflict rule on divorces (§ 50), as the Czech Republic is not bound by the Rome III regulation. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 6:55 am
” Id. at *47. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 11:00 pm
The court clarified a number of issues relating to the scope of Art. 22 No 1, the obligations of the court second seised under Art. 27(1) as well as the relationship between Art. 22 No 1 and 27(1) Brussels I-Regulation. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
., Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, 1 July 2008, no. 58243/00, § 62 and 63; Rotaru v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Canada (Attorney General), [2005] 1 SCR 533 It is well understood that in Canada the grant of a patent is akin to a contract or bargain between the patentee on the one hand and the government of Canada (representing the interests of the general public) on the other. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 5:33 am
The sidebar was held from 12:02:47 to 12:10:41 p.m., and during that sidebar, Agent Morse sent 4 text messages and received 4 text messages. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:39 pm
I.N.S., 348 F.3d 43, 47 (2nd Cir. 2003); see also Kolek v. [read post]
