Search for: "J F O"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 3,834
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has explained that this standard is designed “[t]o discourage the litigation of frivolous, unreasonable, groundless, or vexatious claims, but without discouraging the rigorous enforcement of federal rights under Title VII. [read post]
3 May 2016, 9:00 pm
Supp. 3d at 560. [8] Judge O&r [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Do Critics of Police Have the First Amendment Procedural Protections That Nazis Get?
22 Jan 2021, 8:26 am
" Bey at ¶44 (citing O'Brien v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:11 am
J. [read post]
12 May 2017, 3:50 am
Santamaría Ots dijo que en Puerto Rico se han hecho dos estudios recientes sobre estos privilegios contributivos, el de KPMG y el del economista Ramón J. [read post]
13 May 2021, 7:06 am
(f) It is the policy of the Federal Government that: (i) information and communications technology (ICT) service providers entering into contracts with agencies must promptly report to such agencies when they discover a cyber incident involving a software product or service provided to such agencies or involving a support system for a software product or service provided to such agencies;… [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 12:02 pm
§ 1010.380(f)(8). [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:56 am
Item 401(f), Reg. [read post]
21 May 2020, 1:17 pm
(j) Control cable abrasion. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 12:01 pm
Terris, Stephen J. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 11:44 am
El artículo 75 de la LGSMIME establece que la votación recibida en una casilla será nula cuando de actualice cualquiera de las siguientes causales de nulidad: a) Que la casilla se instale, sin causa justificada, en un lugar distinto al que se haya determinado. b) Que el paquete que contiene los expedientes electorales se entregue a los consejos distritales del IFE, sin causa justificada, fuera de los plazos legalmente previstos. c) Que el escrutinio y cómputo de los votos… [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
Robert F. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 8:15 am
O’Farrell J concluded (at para 52 of her judgment): “where the clinicians have followed the Mental Capacity Act and good medical practice, there is no dispute with the family of the person who lacks capacity or others interested in his welfare, and no other doubts or concerns have been identified, there is no requirement to bring the matter before the court. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 8:30 am
Autry, Roland F. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 1:55 pm
The conduct of Mr Beattie, which was considered by Webster J to amount to a device (see R v Eastleigh Borough Council, ex p. [read post]
9 May 2007, 5:25 pm
J. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Vitek, Inc., 803 F. [read post]
13 May 2016, 7:55 am
The project has been overseen by its reporter, Stephen J. [read post]
