Search for: "Line v. People" Results 2661 - 2680 of 13,520
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm by Schachtman
On the Democratic side of the 2016 and 2020 elections, there was a dramatic change in the line-up. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:45 pm by Andrew Hamm
Massachusetts imposes extra limitations to the Supreme Court’s established line of free-exercise jurisprudence during a pandemic. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Eve Gaumond
” To be constitutionally valid, a limitation on freedom of expression has to be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society following the four-step test from R v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 4:20 am by Chris Seaton
We were doing really well over the last three years so we hired this guy and his wife to work as a line cook and waitress. [read post]
Bottom Line Although the COVID-19 outbreak has caused many people to telework, the EEOC has indicated disabled employees aren’t automatically permitted to work from home after the pandemic subsides. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 7:44 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Biggest takeaway: the federal judiciary has been comprehensively reshaped over the past 4 years by people who were not hired for their opinions on IP. [read post]
The California Court of Appeal recently weighed in on the “unlimited vacation policy” debate in McPherson v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 1:16 pm by Robert Chesney
In fact, the opening lines of section 1752(c)(1)(C) seem rather strong on this point, describing the NCD as lead agency for “coordination of implementation” of national strategies and policies. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
I woke last Sunday morning to find an email with the subject line, “Hysterical Racist Hack. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
 The company says it will now make changes to the service, which lets IT administrators “help their people get the most” from its products, in order to limit the amount of information about individual employees that is shared with managers. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 5:00 pm by Michael Douglas
Akai Pty Ltd v People’s Insurance Co Ltd (1996) 188 CLR 418, 429 (Dawson and McHugh JJ), 445 (Toohey, Gaudron and Gummow JJ). [8] Ibid, quoted in RCD Holdings (n 1) [57]. [9] Ibid, [58]. [10] Ibid. [11] See, eg, British Aerospace plc v Dee Howard Co [1993] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 368; Incitec Ltd v Alkimos Shipping Corp (2004) 138 FCR 496, 506; Australian Health & Nutrition Association Ltd v Hive Marketing Group Pty Ltd (2019) 99 NSWLR 419. [12]… [read post]