Search for: "Marks v. United States" Results 2661 - 2680 of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2012, 10:02 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The United States 5th Circuit Court of Appeals issued an opinion in 2008, that is on point. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 10:04 am
The bill would override a notable 2009 court decision, Palmer/Sixth Street Properties, L.P. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by Beth Graham
It is currently unknown whether Rheingold will file a petition for certiorari with the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:50 am by Amy Howe
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in just one case:  United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
Indeed, abolitionists have good reason to fear such a reaction given what happened several decades ago in the wake of the United States Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Furman v. [read post]
The United Kingdom Supreme Court began hearing a legal challenge centered on the definition of “woman” on Tuesday, marking the latest development in a long-running dispute between a women’s rights campaign group and the Scottish government. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 12:20 am
GuestKat Peter Ling reports on this interesting decision.Richard Vary provides a guest contribution, in which he looks into the recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, which overturned a decision issued in December 2017 by Judge Selna in the Central District of California, instead going to a jury trial.Trade MarksGuestKat Léon Dijkman looks at the recent Opinion of Advocate General Bobek in Primart… [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:05 am by David Markus
Archer, 531 F.3d 1347, 1352 (11th Cir. 2008), and United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 2:59 pm by Nikki Siesel
On April 20, 2006 the Applicant filed a trademark application for NATIONSTAR pro se with the United States Patent & Trademark Office (“USPTO”). [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:39 am
  As it also explains, most state courts in the United States are courts of “general” jurisdiction, which means they can hear “any case over which no other tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 12:37 pm
Ceballos, the United States Supreme Court held that a government employee's speech made in a official capacity was not protected under the First Amendment. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 5:23 pm by Scott M. Pearson
Democratic Senator Mark Warner has introduced a bill, S.1642, that would override the Second Circuit’s decision in Madden v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 3:44 am
 and that Coley's use of the mark was without due cause. [read post]