Search for: "People v. Mays"
Results 2661 - 2680
of 39,685
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2011, 10:07 am
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Deputy Commissioner David V. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 1:28 pm
Last month,in People v Weaver (5/12/09)(discussed here, the Court of Appeals held that the New York Constitution requires that a warrant issued upon probable cause be issued before the police can monitor someone's whereabouts by surreptitiously attaching an electronic device (GPS) to that person's automobile. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:26 am
§ 15A-1413(b)(l3) provides that a probation officer may, at reasonable times, conduct warrantless searches of a probationer’s person and STATE V. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
ATKINSON, Plaintiff, : v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:00 pm
ATKINSON, Plaintiff, : v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 12:00 am
Do you have any idea how rude that was to the people involved? [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:58 am
See George & Co., 575 F.3d at 398 (4th Cir. 2009) (“[e]vidence of only a small number of instances of actual confusion may be dismissed as de minimis. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:48 am
Allied Modular * Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute False Advertising (Huh?) [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:37 am
As are other people, apparently, as the lower tribunals go this way and that. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
Supreme Court held in 2006 in Burlington Northern v. [read post]
28 Jul 2005, 10:20 pm
We had previously discussed in this post the First Circuit's opinion in United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 9:23 am
Snap and Grossman v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 11:51 am
Amazon and Columbia Records v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 12:26 pm
"You can get from even this brief quote the tenor of Judge Kozinski's concurrence, in which he articulates his view that Congress (and the President) can do pretty much whatever they want to people who want to come to the United States.Reading that quote made me wonder:What would Judge Kozinski's grandfather think of his grandson's concurrence? [read post]
7 May 2012, 6:13 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 4:53 pm
He rightly accepted that serious harm may be inferred. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 6:04 am
This week a divided panel of the Fifth Circuit held in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:33 am
In NCTA v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 8:27 am
We have just learned that Atlantic Recording v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 8:56 am
The most important choice may have been not to mount a challenge to the Court’s precedents in this area, including Smiley v. [read post]
