Search for: "People v. Mays" Results 2661 - 2680 of 39,081
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2016, 2:31 pm
 Yeah, he was right of center, and yeah, people (including the defendants) did not like that. [read post]
20 May 2011, 2:38 pm by Kim Krawiec
Barak’s recent paper on the “rabbinic cartels” reminded me that I wanted to provide some updates on Kamakahi v. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 9:16 am by Eric Goldman
The ruling also reinforces the possibility Facebook may have overestimated its cleverness by flipping on FOSTA and encouraging plaintiffs to sue it. [read post]
30 May 2017, 12:26 pm
"You can get from even this brief quote the tenor of Judge Kozinski's concurrence, in which he articulates his view that Congress (and the President) can do pretty much whatever they want to people who want to come to the United States.Reading that quote made me wonder:What would Judge Kozinski's grandfather think of his grandson's concurrence? [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:30 am by INFORRM
On 19 May 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26. [read post]
10 Nov 2024, 8:58 am by Eric Goldman
Publisher/speaker claims: “Plaintiff alleges that Defendant allowed people to post defamatory information about him on their website, and did not remove the information. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:42 pm by Brian Shiffrin
"[T]rial counsel's duty of effective assistance includes the responsibility to advise the defendant concerning the exercise of [the] constitutional right" to testify at trial (Brown v Artuz, 124 F3d 73, 74, cert denied 522 US 1128; see People v Carpenter, 52 AD3d 729, lv denied 11 NY3d 830; People v Perry, 266 AD2d 151, 152, lv denied 95 NY2d 856). [read post]
15 May 2022, 12:25 am by Frank Cranmer
When people – especially political people – start pleading “common sense”, to our suspicious minds it always sounds as if they simply can’t be bothered to conduct a rigorous analysis of their own proposals. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:37 am
As are other people, apparently, as the lower tribunals go this way and that. [read post]